- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Emery Jones Leaving
Posted on 12/12/24 at 4:35 pm to LifeAquatic
Posted on 12/12/24 at 4:35 pm to LifeAquatic
quote:
In 2024, our non-QBs have run for 1426yds on 4.7yds per carry (in 12g).
In 23, we weren’t hitting as many big plays in the run game, but were consistently getting short to medium gains and getting first downs.
This year’s numbers don’t reflect the higher number of non-sack negative run plays. Durham’s big runs prop the numbers up to look closer to last season, but we weren’t nearly as efficient or effective. We all saw this especially in the red zone and in our inability to consistently pick up key short yardage first downs on the ground.
Your one difference between this year and last- Chester, is a big reason why. A lot of our run game, especially early in the season, was focused between the tackles and we know Chester struggled to hold the point of attack and also missed several assignments resulting in negative plays. He was also calling protections, which I’m sure didn’t help. Turner, for all of his physical shortcomings, executed much better and the entire OL played better as a result.
Sloan didn’t help matters with play calling. Then we also had a first year starter in Nuss, who we all saw get baited into checks to the run over a feigned blitz that turned into 0 or negative plays.
Many of you assume Daniels was the only reason the OL performed better in the past. We can’t discount his effect, but it wasn’t a blanket over everything. He may have affected LBs and Safeties a lot, but he didn’t get movement on the NGs and DTs who regularly run stuffed us this season. We didn’t open holes in the interior of the line at the same rate as last year, and Chester, not Daniels, is your biggest reason why. Having Daniels this season would not have helped that.
There’s one more issue that definitely didn’t help the run game. Once Emery went down, Durham was the only back we had who was a decent fit for the scheme and OL personnel this season. Sloan should have adjusted more and that’s on him, but we needed backs with immediate burst to the hole and great vision to pair with our zone blocking. Neither Williams nor Jackson have that. Jackson’s lack of vision is a big issue and he probably needs to be in a gap run scheme somewhere else to succeed. Durham’s injury certainly didn’t help either, since is definitely slowed him a step or two in multiple games after.
This post was edited on 12/12/24 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 12/12/24 at 4:48 pm to LifeAquatic
quote:take the 13th game out for 2023 (Nuss was the QB) and it is even more glaring.
Just for comparison: In 2023, our non-QBs ran for a total of 1455yds on 5.1yds per carry (in 13g). In 2024, our non-QBs have run for 1426yds on 4.7yds per carry (in 12g).
Posted on 12/12/24 at 8:53 pm to Datbayoubengal
I thought we had legit board insider information that he was staying? Hmm.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 8:58 pm to moock blackjack
quote:
Knew this was coming 4-5th round guy Should stay
He will be 1st or 2nd guard taken in draft. Probably late 1st round. Him coming back to play out of position another year would have not improved his draft stock.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 11:54 pm to misey94
quote:
He may have affected LBs and Safeties a lot, but he didn’t get movement on the NGs and DTs who regularly run stuffed us this season
Uhhh… running QBs for sure do impact the defensive interior. It’s really hard to get away with playing an aggressive, penetrating, gap-shooting style against a running QB, because it almost leaves you no choice but to have your LBs crash - which is exactly what the QB is watching for in the read option. So you either leave your LBs with a near-impossible assignment and risk getting gashed in the run game, or you have to get help from somewhere else… in which case you leave yourself open to getting gashed through the air.
Seriously, did you not watch OUR defense this year? This was their exact problem. Our DL generated plenty of those tackles for loss that you mentioned, but when we came up against a running QB, we basically had to pick 2 of the 3 possibilities (qb run, rb run, pass) to stop and then just pray that we guessed right. Obviously part of that was the fact that we didn’t have the greatest talent on the defensive interior - but it’s also the case that the QBs who were gashing us were a far far far cry from what Jaden Daniels was.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 12:35 am to GT3324
He will be a guy who tests well at the combine/pro day
Popular
Back to top

1




