- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dexter Pratt
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:22 pm to sportsinfogeauxlsu
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:22 pm to sportsinfogeauxlsu
quote:
especially since he has had injury issues in the past
Not major injuries... this is like NFL scouts that said AD was injury prone coming out of OU.
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:23 pm to OBUDan
quote:
I like the idea in principle, but do you take the risk of ruffling several scholarship players, plus future recruits feathers for that?
i'm not talking about using it as our main offense. something to use 10 times a game or so, maybe more if it's working
i don't think a john williams or jerad mitchell would mind getting more PT while playing option QB
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:24 pm to sportsinfogeauxlsu
quote:
I seem to remember lots of picks outta the spread
a good # of picks, but we moved the ball and scored also, which was better than our offense doing nothing in les ball
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm not "Worried" about the RB position, but with keiland/scott/murphy getting up there, we haven't really replaced them (Due to depth). you can't say that we are deep at RB going into 2010 without pratt or michael
Well, Murphy will be a senior. I think we can see his athleticism and what not... but sometimes it just takes players longer to put it all together.
Ridley will be there.
Ford.
Calhoun/maybe J .Williams.
That's 4 maybe 5 guys.
Throw in Singleton. Seastrunk and another freshman.
We're up around 5-6.
I guess I don't see it.
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:24 pm to sportsinfogeauxlsu
quote:
I seem to remember lots of picks outta the spread
I seem to remember he just sucked most of the time.
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm not talking about using it as our main offense. something to use 10 times a game or so, maybe more if it's working
i don't think a john williams or jerad mitchell would mind getting more PT while playing option QB
Oh, gotcha. Well then, yeah, of course.
I thought you were talking about whole sale offensive overhaul
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm not talking about using it as our main offense. something to use 10 times a game or so, maybe more if it's working
i don't think a john williams or jerad mitchell would mind getting more PT while playing option QB
I wouldn't even need the squad to get that "creative." I would just like to have seen some more simple stuff like putting Scott at FB and KW at tailback in the I-formation. Hell, we saw it for one half of one game... it was unstoppable, and then we just decided that it was too easy I guess?
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:25 pm to OBUDan
quote:
but sometimes it just takes players longer to put it all together.
if he weren't a RB or DT, i wouldn't be critical
those positions = easy transition if you have the physical tools to play
quote:
Throw in Singleton. Seastrunk and another freshman.
i'm not accepting seastrunk as a RB at LSU until he signs his papers AND makes it to campus
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:26 pm to OBUDan
quote:
I thought you were talking about whole sale offensive overhaul
naw, esp with a spread OC running the show
but it's something that would have helped and couldn't have hurt
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:26 pm to Stagg8
quote:
I wouldn't even need the squad to get that "creative." I would just like to have seen some more simple stuff like putting Scott at FB and KW at tailback in the I-formation. Hell, we saw it for one half of one game... it was unstoppable, and then we just decided that it was too easy I guess?
biggest problem crowton's had at LSU
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:27 pm to OBUDan
switching to he option would have been dumb...would have ben a step backwards for the program
I want to go the opposite way and see Crowton opn it up.. JJ/RS at QB, a single back or even an empty backfield much of the time, 3-4 WRs or gadget players always on the field spreading out every inch of the field
I want to go the opposite way and see Crowton opn it up.. JJ/RS at QB, a single back or even an empty backfield much of the time, 3-4 WRs or gadget players always on the field spreading out every inch of the field
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:28 pm to Derby Tigah
quote:
would have ben a step backwards for the program
the option is vogue right now. i don't see how it's a step "back"
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
lee didn't look that bad when we were running spread
lee looked horrible when we went into les ball
You were on that early Jarrett Lee bandwagon and just cannot fully admit that he was a lost deer in the headlights
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:30 pm to Maximus
quote:
ot an every down RB, Derbs. But we can't have all 230 lb slow running backs.
TR is an every down RB with plenty of speed... I think Lache will also be one who will be able to handle a high carry count
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:31 pm to Derby Tigah
I just hope Jefferson continues to work on his mechanics. Anyone who watched him in high school and then again this year knows that he looked almost like a completely different quarterback. If he can resist the urge to be complacent, I think he could be a very solid QB next year with the ability to make plays and not just be a "game manager."
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:32 pm to Derby Tigah
quote:
blame Les for Lee sucking..nice
i'm not putting the blame anywhere. just saying lee was much less effective as a QB when we went into les ball
quote:
You were on that early Jarrett Lee bandwagon
he was a surprise and has gotten far too much shite
quote:
and just cannot fully admit that he was a lost deer in the headlights
who denies this?
the question is if he was our best option, and he was. hatch was horrible and JJ was even further behind lee
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:34 pm to Stagg8
i have no doubt that JJ will be a player
we haven't had a manager at QB for long stretches (hatch was a manager) since the 90s
we haven't had a manager at QB for long stretches (hatch was a manager) since the 90s
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if he weren't a RB or DT, i wouldn't be critical
those positions = easy transition if you have the physical tools to play
Yeah, I know. But every player is different... I'm just not ready to wholesale give up on him when it's obvious he has ability. Some RBs really need lots of carries to develop rhythm too.
quote:
i'm not accepting seastrunk as a RB at LSU until he signs his papers AND makes it to campus
Well, obviously. But we're still going to get someone.
If not LS, then maybe Marcus Lattimore out of SC.
I just think there are lots of options and lots of talents... and it will be attractive to players considering the way we run the ball.
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the option is vogue right now. i don't see how it's a step "back"
LSU showed that superior athletes can shut it down... it is obsolete hence why less teams are running it nowadays
Any time you confine your team in space like the option does it can be shut down more easily than using the entire field to your advantage and putting playmakers in space
Florida has figured it out... they should be the model of what the modern day offense should be... even Pro-Style attacks like when JaMarcus was here, or OU and USC this year, are what offense should be in today's landscape
Posted on 1/17/09 at 4:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we haven't had a manager at QB for long stretches (hatch was a manager) since the 90s
Mauck comes real close to that moniker.
Popular
Back to top


0



