- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would military board be too specific
Posted on 10/31/16 at 11:02 am
Posted on 10/31/16 at 11:02 am
I know that we already have a lot of boards and I only use a few, trant, secrant, recruiting OT, moresports, maybe if not full on....seasonally for veterans day, memorial day, etc...not really political. ..just people who like talking grunt stuff n vets like me...seems to be some interest? Feedback? Oh...n I love the help board btw
This post was edited on 10/31/16 at 11:04 am
Posted on 10/31/16 at 11:12 am to Dave lsu 89
I would say that military falls under "politics" and that there are already a lot of boards
jmho
jmho
Posted on 10/31/16 at 11:22 am to dcbl
I agree there are too many boards, perhaps we could run a pilot...study the overall utilization rates and dump the most under performing? Fwiw, I just hate to get mixed up I'm the police board over war stories both current and prior amongst fellow tders, and pollute other boards...it was brought up in the OT,and maybe tRANT, so I'm just posing a scenario where we may try a utilization analysis and dump the lowest performer (s) with a milItaly board if given proper time.
This post was edited on 10/31/16 at 11:27 am
Posted on 10/31/16 at 11:52 am to Dave lsu 89
Since one does not exist, military threads (not political) would go on the OT.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 2:27 pm to CaptainsWafer
10-4, Thank you captn!
This post was edited on 10/31/16 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 10/31/16 at 6:10 pm to dcbl
quote:
I would say that military falls under "politics" and that there are already a lot of boards
The poliboard went off the deep end a long time ago. It needs a purging.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 6:19 pm to Jim Rockford
Don't hold your breath. Clicks = $$$
Posted on 11/1/16 at 6:42 am to Dave lsu 89
I'm fine with whatever...as long as political talk is isolated and contained.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 7:55 am to CaptainsWafer
quote:
Since one does not exist, military threads (not political) would go on the OT.
why?
it seems like military is an extension of foreign policy - no?
* whether to increase or decrease spending
* national guardsmen are being forced to pay back signing bonuses
* we attacked XYZ country
* XYZ country is holding our soldiers hostage
* a base in Alabama is being closed
etc
I would argue that 90% + of the time, a military topic should default to politics...
Posted on 11/1/16 at 7:56 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
The poliboard went off the deep end a long time ago. It needs a purging.
right now that board is driving A LOT of site traffic
Posted on 11/1/16 at 11:25 am to dcbl
Did you miss the not political part?
If you want to discuss the political implications of foreign policy and military action go knock yourself out on the political board. It's a political discussion involving the military.
If you want to discuss a tank or the anniversary of some war, being that it isn't political, it would go on the OT.
If you want to discuss the political implications of foreign policy and military action go knock yourself out on the political board. It's a political discussion involving the military.
If you want to discuss a tank or the anniversary of some war, being that it isn't political, it would go on the OT.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 7:17 pm to CaptainsWafer
quote:
CaptainsWafer
not looking to piss in your wheaties man...
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:04 pm to dcbl
Captain hates the military like Hugo
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:14 pm to LewDawg
Well that's just flat out wrong.
Back to top
