- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why was my Steele-Recruiting Question Thread Anchored?
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:48 am
LINK
Okay Chicken, now I can understand you guys anchoring threads with irrational hate and no substance. You should.
But my thread had substance and was thought out, like all my thread starters and I thought it sparked good discussion.
Sure, while I do not like the Steele hire, I am not trolling the board with non-substantive posts.
I'm disappointed. I have been here ten years, and the moderation has never been heavyhanded like it has been on the Steele hire.
Could you give me a specific reason why you thought my thread wasn't worthy to be bumped normally by responses?
Okay Chicken, now I can understand you guys anchoring threads with irrational hate and no substance. You should.
But my thread had substance and was thought out, like all my thread starters and I thought it sparked good discussion.
Sure, while I do not like the Steele hire, I am not trolling the board with non-substantive posts.
I'm disappointed. I have been here ten years, and the moderation has never been heavyhanded like it has been on the Steele hire.
Could you give me a specific reason why you thought my thread wasn't worthy to be bumped normally by responses?
This post was edited on 1/14/15 at 11:50 am
2
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:52 am to timlan2057
I didn't anchor it, but for someone worried about others psychological issues, you seem to have some of your own...
Yikes.
Yikes.
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:56 am to RummelTiger
quote:
I didn't anchor it, but for someone worried about others psychological issues, you seem to have some of your own...
Why thank you Rummel, I appreciate that.
I didn't realize that a long-time poster who supports this site and talks it up everywhere, asking a question frankly but respectfully, amounted to "psychological issues."
Forgive me for asking. I'll crawl back in my hole now.
Posted on 1/14/15 at 12:00 pm to timlan2057
I un-achored your thread but won't guarantee that it won't get the anchor again.
You can complain about all of the heavy handed adminning you want. We have been very fair.
Posters need to start reading before starting threads and can voice frustration and displeasure without name calling or threatening violence towards the coaching staff or administration.
We don't care how long a poster has been here or how many posts they have. If your post is bad, it will get anchored or deleted. If it is a repeat thread, it will probably be anchored or deleted.
If your thread is on the wrong board, it will be moved, anchored or deleted.
I suggest that posters take a few minutes to read the board before starting a new thread to see if their thought would fit into an existing thread.
You can complain about all of the heavy handed adminning you want. We have been very fair.
Posters need to start reading before starting threads and can voice frustration and displeasure without name calling or threatening violence towards the coaching staff or administration.
We don't care how long a poster has been here or how many posts they have. If your post is bad, it will get anchored or deleted. If it is a repeat thread, it will probably be anchored or deleted.
If your thread is on the wrong board, it will be moved, anchored or deleted.
I suggest that posters take a few minutes to read the board before starting a new thread to see if their thought would fit into an existing thread.
Posted on 1/14/15 at 12:14 pm to TigerFred
Fred, thanks for the explanation.
Just put the anchor back on. It is on the back pages now anyway.
I fail to see though, that my OP had the following in it:
But that's fine. I have been here a decade, have always enjoyed this site, and do not want to be trouble.
I assure you, I will not post again about the Steele hire.
Just put the anchor back on. It is on the back pages now anyway.
I fail to see though, that my OP had the following in it:
quote:
Posters need to start reading before starting threads and can voice frustration and displeasure without name calling or threatening violence towards the coaching staff or administration.
But that's fine. I have been here a decade, have always enjoyed this site, and do not want to be trouble.
I assure you, I will not post again about the Steele hire.
Posted on 1/14/15 at 12:19 pm to timlan2057
I don't know why your post got the anchor. There may have been a similar topic about his recruiting.
That part of my post was directed to your comment about the heavy handed adminning.
You aren't in trouble.
That part of my post was directed to your comment about the heavy handed adminning.
You aren't in trouble.
Posted on 1/14/15 at 12:30 pm to timlan2057
quote:
asking a question frankly but respectfully
I disagree with the "respectfully" part... But, just so I have it straight, it's okay for you to insinuate that an LSU coach has these issues, but it's wrong for anyone to say it about you? Okay.
quote:
Forgive me for asking. I'll crawl back in my hole now.
Well...okay.
Posted on 1/14/15 at 12:30 pm to TigerFred
Fred, you should get the Nicest Admin Evar Award.
Posted on 1/14/15 at 1:15 pm to terd ferguson
Eat shite Terd
Posted on 1/14/15 at 1:30 pm to timlan2057
quote:
I fail to see though, that my OP had the following in it
quote:From your OP...
name calling
quote:
this guy was a TOTAL loser
Posted on 1/14/15 at 3:25 pm to boom roasted
I'd hate to see what he would've posted if he hadn't been so respectful...
Posted on 1/15/15 at 6:07 am to RummelTiger
Rummel, I was not referring to the man personally with the term "total loser."
I think that should have been obvious, given his record as head coach at Baylor.
He was 9-36 overall and 1-31 in conference.
As far as his coaching record, I'd say the term fits.
I think that should have been obvious, given his record as head coach at Baylor.
He was 9-36 overall and 1-31 in conference.
As far as his coaching record, I'd say the term fits.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 7:38 am to TigerFred
quote:
We don't care how long a poster has been here or how many posts they have. If y
I dont believe this. you mean to tell me someone like Rex has the leeway on trolling that some alabama fan newb has?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News