- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Racism and the RA process
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:04 am
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:04 am
I understand that dropping racial epithets about African American get those posts cut down and sometime get the perma-ban.
I replied and RAed a post here LINK and it was ignored.
Care to explain the seeming double standard?
I replied and RAed a post here LINK and it was ignored.
Care to explain the seeming double standard?
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:14 am to CountryVolFan
so you are asking why that person should not be banned for calling you an indian giver?
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:36 am to BRgetthenet
quote:
That isn't racist.
It's very offensive to Native Americans.
It's more offensive to me than Redskins.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:37 am to CountryVolFan
Please explain why it is offensive to you?
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:39 am to au21tigers
quote:
Please explain why it is offensive to you?
Seriously?
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:44 am to CountryVolFan
quote:I'd like to see an explanation.
Seriously?
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:44 am to CountryVolFan
quote:
Seriously?
Yes, seriously. You posted this earlier:
quote:
I'm tired of my heritage being shoplifted for the purpose of scoring political points.
Sounds like you should take your own advice.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:50 am to UPT
quote:
I'm tired of my heritage being shoplifted for the purpose of scoring political points.
quote:
Sounds like you should take your own advice.
Nice
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:51 am to UPT
The term Indian giver carries a negative connotation when dealing with the natives relations with settlers term Redskins does not.
Indian giver implies that all Indians or natives were ignorant or dishonest.
Indian giver implies that all Indians or natives were ignorant or dishonest.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:57 am to CountryVolFan
just admit that you're being disingenuous and that you're trying to make some weak political point on the Help Board.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 11:59 am to CountryVolFan
quote:I don't think it implies that at all.
Indian giver implies that all Indians or natives were ignorant or dishonest.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 12:00 pm to boom roasted
What does it mean to you?
Posted on 6/11/14 at 12:08 pm to CountryVolFan
The word VOL in your name offends me. I will assume it means Volunteer, which along with other meanings, is an offensive title given to Civil War militia known as Rebels.
Lighten up.
Lighten up.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 12:34 pm to CountryVolFan
To me, it means someone who wants the gift back or something in return.
People with intelligence don't think it means all Native Americans are ignorant or whatever else you said.
People with intelligence don't think it means all Native Americans are ignorant or whatever else you said.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 2:14 pm to CountryVolFan
quote:
The term Indian giver carries a negative connotation when dealing with the natives relations with settlers term Redskins does not. Indian giver implies that all Indians or natives were ignorant or dishonest.
Your dumb. Check your history. The term "Indian Giver" refers to American settlers not the Indians.
Popular
Back to top
