Started By
Message

re: The Bluffs??

Posted on 3/11/26 at 6:12 pm to
Posted by Batman86
Member since Mar 2020
605 posts
Posted on 3/11/26 at 6:12 pm to
More like $25-30M. That place is huge and will take a massive undertaking to bring it back to life. Good luck.
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6727 posts
Posted on 3/11/26 at 6:25 pm to
You can build a new course from scratch off wooded hills with that.

On good account the Palmer group came un and looked at it with the owner and said 12 to 15
Posted by Batman86
Member since Mar 2020
605 posts
Posted on 3/11/26 at 6:49 pm to
Yeah. That’s based on costs I’ve seen from a golf course architect for the Bluffs specifically to bring back to life. Plus costs for other golf projects. Bluffs is like 500 acres. You can burn thru $12–15M amazingly fast on that track. Plus schedule duration is going to be quite long - with weather impact in Louisiana. Will easily blow that budget out of the water.
Posted by Remnant
Member since Oct 2025
30 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:27 am to
There was a reason it struggled and eventually closed. Those reasons are still there. The dagger in the heart was Beaver Creek and Copper Mill. Why drive that extra distance, pay too much, and then drive back when you can play two of the best courses in the city at a cheaper rate and not spend half a tank of gas getting there and back.

I know the design was enchanting, but even those pale when you think how much they are going to have to charge for green fees just to get a return on their upstart investments. The original owner was keeping it open at a lost, just because he could. Where else are you going to find that kind of money?

Posted by Bawpaw
Member since May 2021
1677 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 6:33 am to
You are exactly right. Copper and Beaver were the nail in the coffin. The other problem was the creek rising and taking out parts of greens and fairways, can’t control mother nature.
Posted by The Johnny Lawrence
Member since Sep 2016
2223 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:36 pm to
The bigger nail was the new clubhouse
Posted by Remnant
Member since Oct 2025
30 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 3:02 pm to
I think the notion is in the mix because Baton Rouge Area golf courses are getting overwhelmed with play... another public golf course would gain traction without really hurting the business of the other public courses. But it needs to be a reasonable drive for people to get to, the problem with that is available land.
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
17524 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:18 pm to
Agreed. When I saw that big arse new clubhouse I figured they were either planning for a casino or bankruptcy.
Posted by reauxl tigers
Tiger Woods Fan
Member since Aug 2014
10009 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

We are moving away from the "tight forest" layout of the 1980s. The Bluffs at Thompson Creek will be transformed into a High-Parkland masterpiece.
Don’t love this, but I guess beggars can’t be choosers.
Posted by VernonPLSUfan
Leesville, La.
Member since Sep 2007
17731 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 8:16 am to
Why don't they just do nine holes first, get revenue coming in and do the other nine later?
Posted by Bawpaw
Member since May 2021
1677 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 8:45 am to
Because nobody is driving all the way there to play for an two hours then leave.
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6727 posts
Posted on 3/13/26 at 10:30 am to
There are enough golfers in the area that would keep the 9 holes busy.

The current owner wants all or nothing. He doesnt have the funds to do all.

Best hope for the bluffs is Hut8 via Trumps kids buy the course and turn it into another one on their collection.

The residents arent active nor care enough to do what's necessary to make it awesome.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram