- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TD 360 Dynasty 2010 - Year 3 Week 3 - Advance 1/26 @ 7 PM
Posted on 2/7/10 at 12:34 am to CPT Tiger
Posted on 2/7/10 at 12:34 am to CPT Tiger
Michigan welcomes Bo Pelini and the Nebraska Cornhuskers to Ann Arbor for a battle of top 20 teams. The black shirts had a much better offensive performance than expected, and the game quickly turned into a shootout. A timely stand by the Wolverine defense allowed UM to push ahead by 7. On the ensuing possession the Wolverine defense again came up big with a fumble recovery that sealed the win. 35-28 final.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 1:12 am to ezride25
quote:
ezride25
What's the deal with the bad blood between you and Art? He quit the dynasty.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 1:42 am to Lieutenant Mike
I'm not really sure. He's good about not calling run commit outside the 20... until it's a critical situation in the game and I'm obviously on a running down. He did it to me in 3* and again tonight. I texted him and said to quit cheesing. Maybe it was just a coincidence?
If we are going to allow run commit anywhere then fine let me have the same advantage. Maybe it was just a mistake
I didn't think he'd take it so personally. I wasn't going to say anything to anyone else, but it seemed to me like he was trying to gain an advantage by using the tactic outside the 20. I just wanted him to play by the rules we agreed to.
If we are going to allow run commit anywhere then fine let me have the same advantage. Maybe it was just a mistake

This post was edited on 2/7/10 at 1:45 am
Posted on 2/7/10 at 2:58 am to ezride25
I never used the run commit and EZ said I did in the 3 * and this league. If I used it how did EZ know? Did I use it before, yes. But I didn't put it in the game. EA did. I just play the game. EZ you played the run commit a few times in our game. Maybe not on purpose but you did use it. I know you have a good DL but you will not be in the backfield that many times. I quit because EZ would text me during the game and accuse me of cheating. We have played 4 games and all 4 he stopped to question me.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 2:52 pm to Art Vandelay
Dude, don't start whining and exaggerating. Yes EA put it in the game. WE agreed to ONLY use run commit in the red zone. You want to use it whenever it's advantageous for you.
Yes. I used run commit also, but it was IN THE REDZONE. There were times I knew you were running the ball, but I didn't call run commit because it was outside the red zone.
The first game we played you used it a lot (as did others) which eventually led to the red zone only distinction. The second time we played more of the same. By our third game there was no excuse for not knowing or forgetting. When you continued to run the tactic outside the red zone I questioned you on it. You claimed "Oh, but you were in the redzone" No I was close and you wanted an advantage.
I was content to just let it ride, but when you did the same shite in our fourth game last night I took exception and texted you to stop. You are deliberately taking advantage of me by playing outside the rules while I play inside them. That's a pretty bitch move there.
You are lying. Why?
Because it's that fricking obvious. It looks nothing like a normal run defense.
We agreed to different rules, and you are using the discrepancy to gain a competitive advantage.
Yes I did, but in the red zone as previously agreed to.
I was surprised at how much penetration my D got, but it was not because I used run commit when I shouldn't have. I was content not to use the tactic at all... if you remember.
You were cheesing, you knew it, and I called you on it. Why are you being so stubborn. If you would just play fair it would be all good.
Yes 4 games. I questioned you on the last two games because it had gotten beyond ridiculous.

Yes. I used run commit also, but it was IN THE REDZONE. There were times I knew you were running the ball, but I didn't call run commit because it was outside the red zone.
The first game we played you used it a lot (as did others) which eventually led to the red zone only distinction. The second time we played more of the same. By our third game there was no excuse for not knowing or forgetting. When you continued to run the tactic outside the red zone I questioned you on it. You claimed "Oh, but you were in the redzone" No I was close and you wanted an advantage.
I was content to just let it ride, but when you did the same shite in our fourth game last night I took exception and texted you to stop. You are deliberately taking advantage of me by playing outside the rules while I play inside them. That's a pretty bitch move there.
quote:
I never used the run commit and EZ said I did in the 3 * and this league
You are lying. Why?
quote:
If I used it how did EZ know?
Because it's that fricking obvious. It looks nothing like a normal run defense.
quote:
Did I use it before, yes. But I didn't put it in the game. EA did. I just play the game.
We agreed to different rules, and you are using the discrepancy to gain a competitive advantage.
quote:
EZ you played the run commit a few times in our game. Maybe not on purpose but you did use it.
Yes I did, but in the red zone as previously agreed to.
quote:
I know you have a good DL but you will not be in the backfield that many times.
I was surprised at how much penetration my D got, but it was not because I used run commit when I shouldn't have. I was content not to use the tactic at all... if you remember.
quote:
I quit because EZ would text me during the game and accuse me of cheating.
You were cheesing, you knew it, and I called you on it. Why are you being so stubborn. If you would just play fair it would be all good.
quote:
We have played 4 games and all 4 he stopped to question me.
Yes 4 games. I questioned you on the last two games because it had gotten beyond ridiculous.

This post was edited on 2/7/10 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 2/8/10 at 12:45 pm to Lieutenant Mike










y cant we all get along
Posted on 2/8/10 at 1:54 pm to ezride25
run commit is overrated, just sling it 

Posted on 2/9/10 at 9:50 am to TruLsu
Mike,
LSU vs Fla. St
Tonight? If so what time are you available?
If not let me know when is good for you.
LSU vs Fla. St
Tonight? If so what time are you available?
If not let me know when is good for you.
Posted on 2/9/10 at 6:27 pm to CPT Tiger
quote:
Mike,
LSU vs Fla. St
Tonight? If so what time are you available?
If not let me know when is good for you.
7 PM?
Posted on 2/9/10 at 10:10 pm to Lieutenant Mike
LSU loses by three when JJ inexplicably misses a wide open TT on 3rd and 8 from the LSU 30 with under 2:00 remaining. FSU drives down and kicks the game winner, even though they were iced.
GG CPT.
Tough contest, but LSU will recover with a beatdown of MSU next weekend.
GG CPT.
Tough contest, but LSU will recover with a beatdown of MSU next weekend.
Posted on 2/9/10 at 10:11 pm to Lieutenant Mike
Slackers, play your games. Next adv tomorrow evening.
Posted on 2/9/10 at 10:26 pm to Lieutenant Mike
GG Golemi!
I want Alem tested for roids, he is a beast coming off the corner.
I want Alem tested for roids, he is a beast coming off the corner.
Posted on 2/10/10 at 1:25 am to ezride25
Notre Dame and south Florida are gonna try to knock it out tomorrow. I get off work at six we should knock it out after that
Posted on 2/10/10 at 7:00 pm to CPT Tiger
quote:
GG Golemi!
I want Alem tested for roids, he is a beast coming off the corner.

Posted on 2/10/10 at 7:02 pm to Lieutenant Mike
Nelly
EZ
Simm
Puma
Lego
Tru
left to play.
Dickheads...
Next adv will probably be Friday night. It looks a no-go tonight and tomorrow night I will be in Covington. Be back in BR on Friday night. If everyone has played, I will advance right away.
EZ
Simm
Puma
Lego
Tru
left to play.
Dickheads...

Next adv will probably be Friday night. It looks a no-go tonight and tomorrow night I will be in Covington. Be back in BR on Friday night. If everyone has played, I will advance right away.
Posted on 2/10/10 at 7:34 pm to Lieutenant Mike
I tried to get with Puma Monday and Tuesday night, but no go yet. Maybe Thursday?
You coming over? It's time to have the first annual BBQ, beerfest, and NCAA Tourney.
quote:
I will be in Covington
You coming over? It's time to have the first annual BBQ, beerfest, and NCAA Tourney.

Posted on 2/10/10 at 8:24 pm to Lieutenant Mike
Well notre dame squeeks by south Florida. Wet conditions caused about 47 fumbles and the game was very sloppy. ND has passed the onslaught of user games and expects to finish the regular season undefeated 

Posted on 2/10/10 at 11:36 pm to ezride25
quote:
You coming over? It's time to have the first annual BBQ, beerfest, and NCAA Tourney.

Posted on 2/10/10 at 11:51 pm to Lieutenant Mike
No, we moved back home about a year ago.
Popular
Back to top
