- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Best Graphics test? 3D Mark?
Posted on 6/18/16 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 6/18/16 at 1:23 pm
Just got a new PC and wanted to test the graphics capabilities out of curiosity.
Posted on 6/18/16 at 2:47 pm to LSU Coyote
3Dmark is good for general graphics benchmark and quick-testing overclocks. I like unigine valley for observing frame times and other hiccups that are hard to catch in the quick 3dmark runs.
Posted on 6/18/16 at 2:51 pm to ILikeLSUToo
Damn true. I've stop running them these last 2yrs and in that time Valley has become popular.
LSUToo is spot on.
LSUToo is spot on.
Posted on 6/18/16 at 9:54 pm to LSU Coyote
i use furmark, decent or rubbish????
Posted on 6/18/16 at 10:35 pm to stlslick
The problem with furmark is that it's not a method of performance measurement. It's designed to maximize heat and power draw by stressing the hell out of one aspect of a GPU. Running the same rendering algorithms over and over isn't a good test of overall performance or even overclock stability other than making sure heat isn't an issue. I do use it on occasion to test the performance of my waterblocks when I first buy them. Other than that, at best, it's like testing your overall strength by trying to push a car uphill with the parking break on. At worst, it's like testing your heart by smoking a bunch of meth.
Popular
Back to top

1







