- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: W......T........F, Boo????? Yes, this needs it's own thread
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:16 pm to rondo
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:16 pm to rondo
quote:
Chill out redd
Why? I am looking for some consistency in this logic and I am finding none.
Sounds to me like some people are pissed they missed out on the firesale. In fact, I stated last night that I was sad because I felt I netted less than all of the other people that got players from Boo.
3
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:16 pm to reddman
what is Arod ranked on your hitter rankings?
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:17 pm to rondo
quote:
what is Arod ranked on your hitter rankings?
in the 80's I think.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:17 pm to rondo
quote:
what is Arod ranked on your hitter rankings?
I think he was in the 80's
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:18 pm to geauxlsu07
quote:nope
because you missed out?
because the trades are retarded
answer my question from earlier. if you're offered the exact reverse deal that you got last night, do you make it?
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:18 pm to reddman
People love conflict. Just look at the past actions of rouge, nobes, pnaq etc the past few years on TD.com. They loved causing uprisings and often tried to cause conflicts. So objecting trades in turn causes people to come here and bitch which in turns gets their little pathetic peckers hard 
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:19 pm to reddman
So how would you feel if I traded Mike Moustakas (assuming I had him) and a 2nd round pick for Arod and a 16th?
Would that be non objectionable IYO?
Would that be non objectionable IYO?
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:19 pm to Rouge
quote:
answer my question from earlier. if you're offered the exact reverse deal that you got last night, do you make it?
That doesn't matter. At all. You are totally missing the point of voting on trades. It's not about whether or not the trade is 100% equal. It is to prevent collusion. That's it.
Find any kind of collusion, and you have a case. Until then, there is no basis for the veto on any of those deals.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:20 pm to Rouge
quote:I have before
f you're offered the exact reverse deal that you got last night, do you make it?
I have traded Halladay for Sandoval
A Gone for Curtis Granderson and something
I also traded Longo/Miggy for Pujols and A-rod
did you care this much then?
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:20 pm to reddman
redd, your stats are only for this season
they dont take into account the badass career that Santana has had to this point
since this is a keeper league, that fricking matters....... A LOT
you got a keeper for a pick and a shitty AAA catcher
it's ok to admit it
they dont take into account the badass career that Santana has had to this point
since this is a keeper league, that fricking matters....... A LOT
you got a keeper for a pick and a shitty AAA catcher
it's ok to admit it
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:21 pm to rondo
quote:
So how would you feel if I traded Mike Moustakas (assuming I had him) and a 2nd round pick for Arod and a 16th?
I would be pissed that I didn't get in on that action.
And unless you made the deal with your best friend IRL who had no intentions of playing next year, then I would not object to the trade. Plain and simple.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:21 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
People love conflict. Just look at the past actions of rouge, nobes, pnaq etc the past few years on TD.com. They loved causing uprisings and often tried to cause conflicts. So objecting trades in turn causes people to come here and bitch which in turns gets their little pathetic peckers hard
Gyno Sanndberg, Fantasy Sports Psychatrist M.D.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:23 pm to Rouge
quote:
redd, your stats are only for this season
they dont take into account the badass career that Santana has had to this point
When you factor in his injuries, the fact that I said going into this year that I thought he was headed downhill, and then fact that his K totals are in the fricking toilet, then past success doesn't matter.
Like I said, you guys just see a name and think "OMG it's Johan! He's a top 5 pitcher in the league!!!"
Not anymore.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:23 pm to reddman
quote:
Find any kind of collusion, and you have a case. Until then, there is no basis for the veto on any of those deals.
you are really now being a serious fig
the point of vetoing trades is NOT ONLY TO PREVENT COLLUSION
if i see that your team is getting significantly better from a trade that will make it more difficult for me to compete and win, you can bet your fricking arse that i am going to veto it
my veto of your deal is about me. you just got a lot better and i want to fricking win, so frick you and frick your trade.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:23 pm to Rouge
seriously though Rouge, you need a closer?
Bell comes at the same price as Rivera, and he's a much better keeper given that Rivera is about to die of old age.
Bell comes at the same price as Rivera, and he's a much better keeper given that Rivera is about to die of old age.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:25 pm to Rouge
quote:
so frick you and frick your trade.
my lord
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:26 pm to Rouge
quote:
if i see that your team is getting significantly better from a trade that will make it more difficult for me to compete and win, you can bet your fricking arse that i am going to veto it
That is NOT why the right to veto is put in place. The only reason it is in place is to prevent collusion. McCain didn't want to have just the commissioner in charge of trade approvals in case a time came up where he himself made a trade.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:27 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
Bell comes at the same price as Rivera, and he's a much better keeper given that Rivera is about to die of old age.
That trade I offered you was the best I can do...you want my 1st you gonna have to take it.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:28 pm to reddman
I pretty much veto any trade that doesn't involve me getting Albert Pujols. That's why Joe's trade has one less objection than yours does, Redd.
Posted on 6/23/10 at 4:28 pm to reddman
Could you imagine if trades had to be approved by the league owners in MLB. Nothing would ever go through because somebody's team would be getting better, or heaven forbid, BOTH teams got better.
What a crock of shite.
What a crock of shite.
Page 5 of 34
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News