- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 3/8/16 at 10:07 pm to Coach D
Posted on 3/8/16 at 10:07 pm to Coach D
See my suggestion on page 101 Coach D. I'm fine with keeping the teams as is and continuing the playoffs as normal, but I figured there would have to be some compromise involved. The situation is pretty fricked up so its not right to really have a hard stance one way or another.
This post was edited on 3/8/16 at 10:09 pm
1
Posted on 3/8/16 at 10:13 pm to TigerTatorTots
Like I said... I feel the same way. If people not in Top 3 get money, they shouldn't be allowed back.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 10:18 pm to Coach D
Drake is a founding father of Pels talk leagues. Technically, he is getting the shite end of the stick due if/since Parsons wasn't supposeded to be dropped and picked up by G$. It's perfectly understandable for the league to offer his buy in back since Parsons COULD HAVE been (not saying was) the deciding factor to their matchup.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 10:44 pm to TigerTatorTots
Parsons played 5 games for me. Of those 5 games, 2 games I would have had another option which would have scored more 9 points than Parsons did.
3 games I played parsons he scored 57 points but I didn't have another option to start in his spot. So that's 57-9=48points. So I would have found a ww guy that would have scored 16 points in 3 games to get me to 48 points. Someone like Robert Covington was available and in three games he scored 23,20, and 15. That's 58 points. 58>48.
3 games I played parsons he scored 57 points but I didn't have another option to start in his spot. So that's 57-9=48points. So I would have found a ww guy that would have scored 16 points in 3 games to get me to 48 points. Someone like Robert Covington was available and in three games he scored 23,20, and 15. That's 58 points. 58>48.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 11:02 pm to Coach D
Sons
I'm embarrassed for you all
May have to change my favorite team icon
I'm embarrassed for you all
May have to change my favorite team icon
Posted on 3/8/16 at 11:26 pm to TigerTatorTots
If that's the case then technically the rules stated weren't actually followed and ICE should get his money back. And technically anyone who loses to the two teams who added those played should get theirs back as well.
Or just DQ the teams who added those players if you wanna go even further with this nonsense y'all have been spewing about giving people money back because they lost and are crying about it.
Or just DQ the teams who added those players if you wanna go even further with this nonsense y'all have been spewing about giving people money back because they lost and are crying about it.
Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:37 am to Coach D
Like I said, the hard line stance you are making isn't ideal with a fricked up situation like this. That's why I was willing to compromise with the ones who are getting the short end of the stick.
I'll let the commish figure it out then since some of us don't want to work through it.
I'll let the commish figure it out then since some of us don't want to work through it.
Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:41 am to TigerTatorTots
Y'all all need to get your entry fee back and then go your separate ways IMO.
Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:55 am to reddman
I'd be embarrassed if Chandler fricking Parsons and Myles fricking Turner scared me so much I was acting like Coach D.
They need to play this shite out....Ice needs to apologize, then be fired. Then the league needs to be disbanded because its ridiculous.
They need to play this shite out....Ice needs to apologize, then be fired. Then the league needs to be disbanded because its ridiculous.
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:01 am to rondo
They just need to stop, collaborate, and listen.
This post was edited on 3/9/16 at 7:02 am
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:30 am to rondo
quote:
I'd be embarrassed if Chandler fricking Parsons and Myles fricking Turner scared me so much I was acting like Coach D.
Actually the opposite. There is a chance I lose this week and next which means getting $0 and that doesn't bother me one bit. There is someone trying to get their money back because they lost to Chandler Parsons though. That's the main issue here now.
I play fantasy sports for the fun. The entry fee is paid to enjoy my time in a league and if I get money back on the back end then it's nothing but icing, but not the reason I play.
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:33 am to Toula
Tdxx leagues are filled to the fricking brim with assholes, but at least we know this type of shite wouldn't happen.
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:41 am to rondo
If it did, a commish would have stopped it within minutes.
These dudes are arguing over add/drops two weeks after it happened. I wouldn't return any money and play it out as is.
These dudes are arguing over add/drops two weeks after it happened. I wouldn't return any money and play it out as is.
Posted on 3/9/16 at 12:38 pm to Toula
That's why I want to table the money issue for now
Let it play out and then look at it will fresh eyes.
We've spent WAY WAY too much time on this for the better part of 3 days.
Its enough
Let it play out and then look at it will fresh eyes.
We've spent WAY WAY too much time on this for the better part of 3 days.
Its enough
Posted on 3/9/16 at 12:43 pm to LosLobos111
Deciding on money issues after the fact will be WAY harder.
Whoever runs this shite show needs to make a ruling and deal with the butthurt later.
If people quit over it, then frick them. They are petulant children.
Whoever runs this shite show needs to make a ruling and deal with the butthurt later.
If people quit over it, then frick them. They are petulant children.
Posted on 3/9/16 at 12:46 pm to rondo
Agreed
Posted on 3/9/16 at 12:48 pm to LosLobos111
quote:
That's why I want to table the money issue for now
Let it play out and then look at it will fresh eyes.
I agree with ron, that sounds like a terrible idea
either give EVERYONE (besides ICE) their money back
or let it play out, take this as a lesson and re-haul the league in the offseason. (plugged in commish, better vetting of new owners, go away from points, etc)
Posted on 3/9/16 at 12:51 pm to TigerTatorTots
I see y'alls point
I think Tots suggestion works best for everyone and makes the most sense:
That's what I was leaning towards
I think Tots suggestion works best for everyone and makes the most sense:
quote:
Here's a suggestion...
Since G$ and I are the ones with Turner and Parson and matched up against each other, let's finish this semi finals matchup. Rather than splitting the pot now, we can split the pot between the two teams in the championship, and both the teams playing for 3rd get their money back.
Example-
Drake is paid $50
Loser of Darryl/Coach D paid $50
Loser of TTT/G$ paid $50
Two championship teams split the main pot.
That way, no one of the 4 teams left get royally fricked bc the two teams who have an Ice player are playing each other.
That's what I was leaning towards
This post was edited on 3/9/16 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 3/9/16 at 12:52 pm to LosLobos111
Yeah and the only person giving you shite over it is coach d
frick him if he can't compromise
frick him if he can't compromise
Posted on 3/9/16 at 12:53 pm to TigerTatorTots
We need to jus to play this out like nothing ever happened. No one gets money back. Tough shite. Just chalk it up as a learning experience .
Page 104 of 114
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News