Started By
Message
locked post

I was offered Ingram for Engram

Posted on 10/17/19 at 1:18 pm
Posted by HarrisLetsRide
Member since Jan 2015
1493 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 1:18 pm
I’ve been playing Waller at the flex, so I could just slide him into the TE slot. Don’t necessarily need RB, but this seems like a good deal for me??
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87570 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 1:21 pm to
The deal itself is fine if you have Waller. However if you "don't necessarily need a RB" Why don't you use one of the TE to get or improve a position of need?
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8787 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:02 pm to
I'd do it. Even if you're not a big Mark Ingram baw, I'd definitely be shopping one those tight ends. There's a really sharp drop off after those top 5/6 guys, and you have two of them.
Posted by rolltide32
Fort Payne, AL
Member since Nov 2013
6784 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:28 pm to
Unless you desperately need to flip a TE for WR help or are QB desperate or something I'd take that deal. Scoring would tweak thoughts a bit but it's a no brainer in standard. Ingram is good for 50-100 yards and a touchdown every week
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram