re: Fantasy Board Regulars Football League

drafted because of implication of 1TE starting...should not with double TE

This is the 1st league I have ever played where you could start 2 TEs...(save Colston that one year)

#1 te going 11th overall normal draft
Gates going in 4th-5th...same as mathews...normal PPR draft

It doesn't look pretty because that was disgustingly lop-sided. For someone who follows evals so closely why would I give up 2 studs for 1? which is what it basically was.

I responded with a counter.

Same as Mathews because of the injury.

You have to look at point differential between the better option and who you'd have to play in his place. They are not even.

quote:

---

For someone who follows evals so closely why would I give up 2 studs for 1?

---

this is a misnomer....stud is made of wood and sometimes steel...not ggggggglaaaaaaasssssssssssssssssss

speaking of ggggllllaaaasssssssss you wanted me to take Gates and 3 shite guys for Mathews, Murray, Celek and Devery.

So basically Math and Murr for Gates. You must think you are going to win this league don't you?

Hell I should just give you Stafford, and Forte for Gronk huh?

quote:

---

. You were basically asking for Murray and Mathews for Gates.

---

um...celek with vick?...probably drop him for miller

you are devaluing TEs..that is the problem

60 pt difference between RBs is HUGE!!!!
100 pt difference in TE is ....no big deal?

donald brown or Kevn smith...are much more likely to produce than Celek or sdevery.

Jesus, what don't you get? I can't plug an RB into a TE position and visa versa. If I gave up those two RBs I'd be stuck with crap for RB2.

Basically I'd have your team.

I know, I should probably throw in Cam to even it up a bit

I cant see that at work


What is it?

frick you kash. That would be two huge upgrades for you and a slight downgrade at te.