- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fantasy Board Regulars Football League
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:13 am to PortCityTiger24
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:13 am to PortCityTiger24
pCT you want to dump MT or get JR?
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:15 am to Iona Fan Man
I would trade Turner for the right deal. Would have to include Bradshaw and someone.
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:18 am to PortCityTiger24
huh...turner>bradshaw?
I'm sorry this won't work between us
I'm sorry this won't work between us
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:18 am to PortCityTiger24
Port, I'll pull the trigger on that deal if you want
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:22 am to GynoSandberg
I'm starting to take this personal
that crap gets the go ahead and my legit stuff stinks to high heaven?
man I need a beer
that crap gets the go ahead and my legit stuff stinks to high heaven?
man I need a beer
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:23 am to PortCityTiger24
frick forgot we got this stupid vote shite
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:25 am to Iona Fan Man
quote:
that crap gets the go ahead and my legit stuff stinks to high heaven?
what are you talking about?
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:31 am to GynoSandberg
Gyno, I know you are a respected player and all. But I do not see how that helped your team at all.
I won't vote against it....but this year may have some growing pains for me.
I seem to have the opposite view of players that the rest of the league has.
just for Shits and GIggles...what was the yahoo green/red numbers?
I won't vote against it....but this year may have some growing pains for me.
I seem to have the opposite view of players that the rest of the league has.
just for Shits and GIggles...what was the yahoo green/red numbers?
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:32 am to Iona Fan Man
quote:
just for Shits and GIggles...what was the yahoo green/red numbers?
This is a feature that I've never seen and will never use.
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:33 am to Iona Fan Man
Pretty simple. Im worried about Peterson bouncing back from injury. I reached for him in the draft and instantly regretted it. After thinking about it I think Turner out produces him and Finley is better that the two TEs im rostering.
I dont know what numbers you are talking about. I base my decisions off of my brain.
I dont know what numbers you are talking about. I base my decisions off of my brain.
This post was edited on 8/15/12 at 12:35 am
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:34 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
This is a feature that I've never seen and will never use.
conveniently enough
can yall even see it still? please just post the numbers for each team
gyno -40
PCT +80?
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:37 am to Iona Fan Man
where are these numbers found? I'll post them
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:37 am to GynoSandberg
actuallly I think it evens out....I didn't realize how much APs production has decreased.
But still can't see how you think Turner's number will stay the same when they have said that they're time sharing with JR
But still can't see how you think Turner's number will stay the same when they have said that they're time sharing with JR
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:38 am to GynoSandberg
bottom of trade should say something like "evaluate trade"
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:40 am to Iona Fan Man
BTW JR for Tate?....michael has alot of tread
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:44 am to Iona Fan Man
They said Turner would lose carries last year too and he was 2nd in the NFL. Even if he loses carries he's good for 1,000 and 10 TDs.
I don't need Rodgers. He's not getting carries if Turner goes down.
I don't need Rodgers. He's not getting carries if Turner goes down.
Posted on 8/15/12 at 12:50 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
I’m almost certain they have big plans for second-year pro Jacquizz Rodgers, and I think those plans might be a lot bigger than people realize. That’s largely because Rodgers is bigger than the Falcons realized when they drafted him last year.
“Jacquizz is not little,’’ Smith said. “He’s short, but he’s thick. People projected him to be a third-down back, a change-of-pace back. I think the guy has the skill set to play on all three downs. One of the things that stood out to me more than anything is his ability to pass protect. A lot of times, your change-of-pace back, you’ve got to get him the ball and not ask him to be a part of the protection. I don’t think that’s the case with Jacquizz. I think Jacquizz is an all-around back that can play on all three downs.’’
Translation: The Falcons aren’t looking for Rodgers to be what Jerious Norwood once was. They want him to be more like what Warrick Dunn once was.
LINK
Posted on 8/15/12 at 7:21 am to Iona Fan Man
Any of you a-holes with two solid TEs want to trade me one? Or all you all planning on exploiting the loop hole in the rules? 
Popular
Back to top


1




