- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WaPo - FBI interviewed top Clinton aide Huma Abedin after investigation closed
Posted on 3/3/18 at 9:11 am
Posted on 3/3/18 at 9:11 am
LINK
Several takeaways here, not all favorable to the right wing narrative. I'd personally pay close attention to how carefully worded one James Jimmy Jim Brien Comey Jr. is. And he has always been this way. Unfortunately one needs to read a lot into how he words things, which is obviously his design.
Several takeaways here, not all favorable to the right wing narrative. I'd personally pay close attention to how carefully worded one James Jimmy Jim Brien Comey Jr. is. And he has always been this way. Unfortunately one needs to read a lot into how he words things, which is obviously his design.
4
Posted on 3/3/18 at 9:22 am to Iowa Golfer
Here's one. NOTHING was done about any of it.
Posted on 3/3/18 at 9:54 am to Iowa Golfer
It is the fricking wapo, why would anything favorable to the right wing anything. When they don't outright lie they openly spin.
Posted on 3/3/18 at 10:03 am to gthog61
quote:
It is the fricking wapo, why would anything favorable to the right wing anything. When they don't outright lie they openly spin.
Exactly. Their spin is that since the FBI interviewed Huma and did not charge her with anything then 1) Strzok is obviously not biased and 2) Huma did nothing wrong.
Only an idiot would believe either one of those.
Also, interesting that Huma was caught forwarding classified emails to her husband, and uploading classified emails to her husband's laptop. Not a single charge brought against either of them.
Posted on 3/3/18 at 10:37 am to Iowa Golfer
"Strzok’s text about Abedin appears to rebut the notion that he was pulling punches for Clinton or her associates, as it shows him advocating for aggressive steps if Abedin’s lawyer were to push for immunity."
When you don't record interviews and you doctor 302's, then nothing about this rebuts the notion that preferential treatment was given to Clinton.
They have Huma on mishandling classified info if not a lot more.
They have Comey on 18 USC 1001 and probably a lot more.
It's too bad our USAG is a coward.
When you don't record interviews and you doctor 302's, then nothing about this rebuts the notion that preferential treatment was given to Clinton.
They have Huma on mishandling classified info if not a lot more.
They have Comey on 18 USC 1001 and probably a lot more.
It's too bad our USAG is a coward.
Posted on 3/3/18 at 11:06 am to Iowa Golfer
Did they give her immunity like they did Cheryl Mills?
If so, why would you give immunity prior to interviewing her?
You only give immunity when you get something in return.
If so, why would you give immunity prior to interviewing her?
You only give immunity when you get something in return.
Posted on 3/3/18 at 2:01 pm to John McClane
They gave immunity to EVERYBODY. They were handing it out like candy- even to guy that wiped the server AFTER the subpoena was issued.
If there was “nothing there” and there were no illegal/criminal acts committed, why did anybody need an immunity deal? And why the need for the FBI to agree to destroy the laptops, phones, and computers of those who were given immunity?!
Because they were all guilty as hell. And the corrupt as frick FBI destroyed all the evidence so that any potential future re-investigation wouldn’t be possible. That in itself is plenty of reason for Trump to call for the DOJ and FBI to thoroughly investigate and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law- Obama and every single member of His administration.
If there was “nothing there” and there were no illegal/criminal acts committed, why did anybody need an immunity deal? And why the need for the FBI to agree to destroy the laptops, phones, and computers of those who were given immunity?!
Because they were all guilty as hell. And the corrupt as frick FBI destroyed all the evidence so that any potential future re-investigation wouldn’t be possible. That in itself is plenty of reason for Trump to call for the DOJ and FBI to thoroughly investigate and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law- Obama and every single member of His administration.
Posted on 3/3/18 at 2:27 pm to CheniereTiger108
quote:
Because they were all guilty as hell. And the corrupt as frick FBI destroyed all the evidence so that any potential future re-investigation wouldn’t be possible. That in itself is plenty of reason for Trump to call for the DOJ and FBI to thoroughly investigate and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law- Obama and every single member of His administration.
Bing-mutherf*cking-O!
Here's what I want to know - how many times in the history of the FBI has that organization not only granted immunity without any proffer of evidence to get a "bigger fish," but also agreed to destroy ALL the evidence turned over -- when they could have easily gotten a subpoena and took the evidence without any agreement to destroy it.
THAT ALONE should raise a million red flags and shows what a complete f*cking clown show and sham this entire "investigation" was.
This post was edited on 3/3/18 at 2:29 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News