- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question about Shawshank: Andy revealing the scams.
Posted on 4/1/24 at 10:54 pm to UndercoverBryologist
Posted on 4/1/24 at 10:54 pm to UndercoverBryologist
Andy's defense would be that he could not have know that Tommy was imprisoned with the twitchy frick unless Tommy himself told him therefore proving that Norton had reason to kill Tommy so that Norton could continue his scams. Even
possibly, proving Andy's innocence. Of course only by having the twitchy frick in custody. Let me know if you understood.
possibly, proving Andy's innocence. Of course only by having the twitchy frick in custody. Let me know if you understood.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)