- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 25% of the LA school budget goes to pensions.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:31 pm to Strannix
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:31 pm to Strannix
Teachers no longer pay into the retirement fund once they retire.
Iirc, it is 6.5% of their salary.
I say that should still be paid.
Ditto state employees.
FWIW, this would not benefit me personally, but I believe it the right thing to do.
To make things more palatable for those retirees (on a fixed retirement income), I would add .5% per year for 15 years.
For those stating to do what I suggest all at once, Each % is roughly 35 bucks a month for most. That doesn’t sound like much, but it is about $400 per year. All 6.5% at once, that is over 5 grand. With inflation, it would be asking too much imho.
However, 35 bucks per month, per state retiree, would add up quickly. Multiply that over 15 years and it would benefit the state in terms of balancing the budget.
Just my .02.
Iirc, it is 6.5% of their salary.
I say that should still be paid.
Ditto state employees.
FWIW, this would not benefit me personally, but I believe it the right thing to do.
To make things more palatable for those retirees (on a fixed retirement income), I would add .5% per year for 15 years.
For those stating to do what I suggest all at once, Each % is roughly 35 bucks a month for most. That doesn’t sound like much, but it is about $400 per year. All 6.5% at once, that is over 5 grand. With inflation, it would be asking too much imho.
However, 35 bucks per month, per state retiree, would add up quickly. Multiply that over 15 years and it would benefit the state in terms of balancing the budget.
Just my .02.
This post was edited on 10/25/21 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 10/25/21 at 9:21 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
I say that should still be paid.
Ditto state employees.
So let me see if I understand. You want retirees to pay the state for drawing a check from money that they already paid to their retirement account?
Just so the state can then take that money and turn right around and write retirees a check, that includes the money that they just gave the state, last month?
Unless that extra 6.5% keeps getting added to their retirement balance, which results in yearly increases? However, that would mean more debt to the state, right?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News