quote:
No major religious denomination in the U.S. opposes vaccination outright. But an individual's "sincerely held" religious belief does not have to be part of an organized-religion mandate to be considered a valid reason for exemption from getting the vaccine. "It can be a personal, sincerely held religious belief which arises from the very nature of freedom of religion articulated in the First Amendment," said Domenique Camacho Moran, a labor attorney at New York-based law firm Farrell Fritz.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by wayak

Member since Oct 2021

186 posts

Posted on 10/9/21 at 4:21 pm to Statestreet

quote:
"It can be a personal, sincerely held religious belief which arises from the very nature of freedom of religion articulated in the First Amendment,"

This is true.

But at the same time, most who are trying to claim this are spewing bullshite.

Why? Because most of modern pharmacy was developed using aborted fetal tissue, or more accurately, cells that are hundreds of generations subsequent to an abortion that was performed in the 1970s. You can read more about the HEK293 cells here and here.

So you're claiming a religious exemption towards the vaccine? Ok, then you also need to stay away from the vast majority of drugs developed since the 1970s, and these:

Tylenol
Advil
Aleve
Sudafed
Benadryl
Claritin
Robatussin
Musinex
Tumms
Maalox
Ex-Lax
Pepito Bismol
Preparation H
Lidocaine
Lipitor
Senokot
Motrin
Prilosec
Zoloft
Any many, many more.

Surely those who are claiming a religious exemption to vaccines will also have the same objection to Tylenol and all the others. Right?

2 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board