Started By
Message

re: Will anything change with entergy?

Posted on 8/31/21 at 9:17 pm to
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9601 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

It’s hard for lines to go down when they are in the ground. I know they all can’t be in the ground but they sure could reduce the impact when they have fewer lines above ground to fix.

Underground power isn’t all its cracked up to be. For starters, it’s incredibly expensive - over 10x the cost per foot of above-ground lines, and that’s for new installations. So in the case of moving an area’s lines underground, imagine the cost to replace ALL of the poles and ALL of the wire in that area… and multiply it by 10.

Second, underground lines are more susceptible to flood damage. Particularly from salt water, which is a risk with storm surge. And when they are damaged, they are, again, much more expensive to repair.

Moving high-voltage transmission lines underground is probably a non-starter anyway.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12666 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Moving high-voltage transmission lines underground is probably a non-starter anyway.

It’s possible just expensive. We have a special projects group that is on a 335 mile 320kV DC project right now. I don’t know the full cost, but when I was helping them facilitate the pull plan one of the PMs mentioned that the normal price is $5M per mile rural and 30$M per mile urban. Thats a mix of HDD and open trench. It can be change if you have to do more of one or the other.
This post was edited on 8/31/21 at 9:26 pm
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
9526 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

Underground power isn’t all its cracked up to be. For starters, it’s incredibly expensive - over 10x the cost per foot of above-ground lines, and that’s for new installations. So in the case of moving an area’s lines underground, imagine the cost to replace ALL of the poles and ALL of the wire in that area… and multiply it by 10.

Second, underground lines are more susceptible to flood damage. Particularly from salt water, which is a risk with storm surge. And when they are damaged, they are, again, much more expensive to repair.

Moving high-voltage transmission lines underground is probably a non-starter anyway.


Entergy care rep, is that you?

I've lived with underground lines for years and the only sustained power loss comes from when a tree falls on the above ground lines elsewhere
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
4326 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 9:52 pm to
quote:


Underground power isn’t all its cracked up to be. For starters, it’s incredibly expensive - over 10x the cost per foot of above-ground lines, and that’s for new installations. So in the case of moving an area’s lines underground, imagine the cost to replace ALL of the poles and ALL of the wire in that area… and multiply it by 10.

Second, underground lines are more susceptible to flood damage. Particularly from salt water, which is a risk with storm surge. And when they are damaged, they are, again, much more expensive to repair.


Always struck me as a bit of a how do you eat an elephant question. Just bite by bite and need to start somewhere. It’s undeniable the quarter and CBD have the most reliable power and it’s buried. Utility lines in neighborhoods like Lakeview have back alleys where lines could be buried without impacting streets and sewer.

Yes it’s expensive but outages are so frequent in the city. As to the saltwater point I’m sure that’s correct. On the other hand if there is saltwater running through the streets of New Orleans again it’s game over anyway and the system is destroyed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram