- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CDC announced another eviction moratorium per Fox8
Posted on 8/3/21 at 6:17 pm to BuckyCheese
Posted on 8/3/21 at 6:17 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Thanks Kav for being a spineless POS.
He drank whatever Kool-Aid Roberts was giving him.
quote:
I agree with the District Court and the applicants that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention exceeded
its existing statutory authority by issuing a nationwide eviction moratorium. See Utility Air Regulatory Group v.
EPA, 573 U. S. 302, 324 (2014). Because the CDC plans to end the moratorium in only a few weeks, on July 31, and
because those few weeks will allow for additional and more orderly distribution of the congressionally appropriated
rental assistance funds, I vote at this time to deny the application to vacate the District Court’s stay of its order. See Barnes v. E-Systems, Inc. Group Hospital Medical & Surgical Ins. Plan, 501 U. S. 1301, 1305 (1991) (Scalia, J., in
chambers) (stay depends in part on balance of equities); Coleman v. Paccar Inc., 424 U. S. 1301, 1304 (1976)
(Rehnquist, J., in chambers). In my view, clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation) would be necessary for the CDC to extend the moratorium past July 31.
LINK
I mean... how fricking stupid can he be? He agreed the CDC overstepped its authority by issuing the moratorium but then said "hey, since it's almost up it can stay." That's an in-fricking-sane precedent. How does someone on the Court even take that into consideration?
And then he tosses out some wide-eyed naivete with their needing "clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation)" to extend it. They are extending it without any new legislation.
Now it's got to go back to court all over again.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/casty.gif)
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 8/3/21 at 6:18 pm to Bard
quote:
Now it's got to go back to court all over again.
If I were a landlord I would just proceed, assuming a State court isn't stopping the process. Let them sue and seek an injunction, they would first have to kick out to federal court.
Than all you have is incomplete notice without the ability of having an administrative hearing.
This would actually all have to go back to the administrative level i.e. agency hearing.
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 6:22 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)