re: Now that players are getting paid for NIL should they have to pay for tuition ?

quote:

---

Tuition has no bearing on what an individual’s brand and a free market dictates.

Universities still have a right to offer these kids a benefit for coming their program.

These are independent of each other and shouldn’t be seen as the same things.

---

Its such a simple concept. Sure, a university can pull schollies and start requesting (or demanding) that these athletes who are making all this extra money on the side, start paying tuition. But thats the second those star players bounce to a different program that doesn't have that view point. So in the long run, at a school that relies so heavily on athletics to bring in revenue....what do you think is the smarter play?