re: spike proteins express themselves both in the placenta and the testes.

quote:

---

For example, tell me why I shouldn't be concerned about the distribution of the lipid nanoparticles.

---

Because its of so little real importance to you that you've not taken time to understand what lipid nanoparticles are, how many decades they've been tested, and how said distribution occurs. If you've not even taken that effort, why waste time chewing your nails in concern?

TBH, I'm not even certain Weinstein claims nanoparticles are harmful though. The study he quotes simply used them as transport media for trackable markers assessing biodistribution in rats (mice).

The problem is, the study Weinstein references required administration of five-hundred times (500X) the appropriate lipid dose in order to gain systemic distribution in recordable quantity. If a person was overdosed 500-fold, we might see spillover in humans akin to the rat study.

quote:

---

One will get the spike protein, possibly into the reproductive organs, the bone marrow, etc, if one chooses the vaccine.

---

Negative.

(1) Systemic spread does indeed occur during infection.
(2) Obviously such spread during infection includes widespread s-protein exposure, including the reproductive organs.
(3) Unless administered improperly (e.g., overdosed 500-fold like the scary rat study worrying you), a vast majority of vaccine is sequestered within the deltoid.
(4) Sequestered vaccine limits systemic spread.

----------------

• There is no such thing as a "placenta filled with spike proteins" secondary to vaccination. None. Period. The nurse making that claim in this thread is an imbecile.

• Sterility following Covid infection is not a thing. It CERTAINLY is therefore not a thing following a CV19-vax. The nurse making that claim in this thread is an imbecile.

• There is no documented instance of teratogenicity d/t Covid infection anywhere. For one thing, unlike measles, rubella, mumps, etc., it is difficult for CV19 to access fetal circulation via the placental barrier.

In and of itself, intransmissiblity doesn't end teratogenic concerns. Viral infection of the cells at the maternal-fetal interface can affect placental function, sometimes severely. That in turn can result in miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, or premature birth. We've not seen that with CV19 though.

So with the widespread effort to scare hell out of the populace over Covid-19, would you not think if Covid infection could be associated with ANY uptick in fetal complications, we'd hear "terrified" journalists screaming such on radio, TV, and in print?

----------------

The problem is, there has been so much demonstrably false Covid-19 information spewed by "experts" that you, as a layman, no longer know what or whom to trust. Filling that void is a cacophony of BS mainly from the left, but also from idiots on the right like the "L&D nurse" in this thread.

BTW, some of what Bret Weinstein asserts is spot on. He may be overstating vax concerns to compensate for the lack of a mainstream megaphone, and in recognition of current stupidity in the field.

Examples of said stupidity ... CV19 originated from Bat Soup, CV19 probably had a "natural origin", HCQ and/or ivermectin are "dangerous" and should never be used as anti-CV19's, even in absence of better alternatives, wearing two cloth masks while fully vaccinated and socially distanced >20-feet is scientifically reasonable, we should subject teens or preteens to emergency use of vaccines which target a virus of exceedingly low-risk to them. None of it makes medical or scientific sense.

So I share his disgust in those areas.

But Weinstein is misstating both findings, and risks associated with the vaccines, and in my opinion he probably knows that.