- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Milazzo cost us in both phases yesterday
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:03 am to jimbeam
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:03 am to jimbeam
quote:
So maybe it was a hit and run?
Nah, you don’t & can’t call a hit & run with 2 strikes
Was just a straight steal he happened to swing at
Ideally he either makes contact or walks. Terrible call with milazzo up because he isn’t good at either of those results
2
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:10 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Nah, you don’t & can’t call a hit & run with 2 strikes
Was just a straight steal he happened to swing at
A 3 ball hit and run
Paul is counting on Milazzo not striking out. He expects the batter to put any strike in play.
If the pitch is a ball the batter doesn’t have to swing and takes his ball 4 and there is no chance to throw the runner out because they move up on the walk (runners were on first and second).
Calculated risk by Mainieri. It failed miserably.
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:54 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Ideally he either makes contact or walks. Terrible call with milazzo up because he isn’t good at either of those results
Milazzo walks a lot and as a catcher he should have a great idea of where the strike zone is. He is a double play candidate so starting the runners on 3-2 with a fastball likely is not a bad play.
It just didn’t work in this instance, but it’s not a terrible call.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News