Started By
Message

re: Mid-Barataria Diversion

Posted on 5/11/21 at 1:45 pm to
Posted by Ron Cheramie
The Cajun Hedgehog
Member since Aug 2016
5154 posts
Posted on 5/11/21 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

What we really need is a system of devices or infrastructure that keeps the sediment suspended for the whole river until it gets to where we need it. Then divert. Even just an increase of say 20% would be huge.


Or in all those areas upstream that are silted in where they are constantly dredging what if they put that dredge material in a barge and ship it down River and build land with it
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 5/11/21 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Or in all those areas upstream that are silted in where they are constantly dredging what if they put that dredge material in a barge and ship it down River and build land with it
The USACE is obligated to maintain the nav channel by the most cost effective method possible. Sometimes this includes beneficial use with the material, but not always. They would need outside dedicated funds in many cases to utilize the sediment to build marsh, and this has been done before. But the money has to come from somewhere (CPRA, etc.)
Posted by chew4219
Member since Sep 2009
2724 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 8:47 am to
quote:

What we really need is a system of devices or infrastructure that keeps the sediment suspended for the whole river until it gets to where we need it. Then divert. Even just an increase of say 20% would be huge.


Or in all those areas upstream that are silted in where they are constantly dredging what if they put that dredge material in a barge and ship it down River and build land with it


There is current discussions ongoing about this exact thing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram