re: The truth behind the Tiger Tank.

How exactly did that article debunk anything about the Tiger being a superior tank to be in during combat? Germany didn't make that many, it drank a lot of gas, it didn't have sloped armor (even though it's armor was still superior to most all other tanks it faced.) These are the main critiques.

The article opened by mocking Hollywood's depiction of the mention of a Tiger present striking fear in Allied soldiers and then proceeded to make strategic critiques, not tactical combat critiques. The fact is, the Tiger was a fantastic tank to be in when the shooting started and it rightfully did strike fear in its enemies when they matched on the battlefield. If that article convinced you otherwise I'd say your critical reading and thinking need some work.