- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for vax refusniks
Posted on 5/6/21 at 9:02 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
Posted on 5/6/21 at 9:02 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
I do not allow experimental drugs to be used on me willingly. I also do not allow drugs rushed through a process to be used on me.
It is perfectly fine that you don't want it. That is your choice, but to perpetuate this lie is bs. You know it is planned to be granted full use authorization within a month? Will you take it then? You know we already have more trial participants starting from last July to have more info on its effectiveness and safety than other drugs that have been grant full use authorization in the past? You realize that the reason they were able to develop and test the vaccine faster than normal was no bureaucratic red tape and literally a global scientific community focused on the same problem. If you don't want it, that's fine and totally your choice But to justify yourself by spreading bs is fricking stupid and it's just mimicking what you have other people say.
3
Posted on 5/6/21 at 9:04 am to PentagonTiger
quote:
You know it is planned to be granted full use authorization within a month? Will you take it then?
I don’t use all meds that are approved by the FDA. They’re not a substitute for our own evaluation process of what is best for our own individual self.
Posted on 5/6/21 at 9:07 am to PentagonTiger
It's still an experimental drug. Even in your post, you claim full authorization is a month or more away. So why not wait and ask him then?
You are also aware that more than 3,000 people have died from taking the vaccine? That's more than any other vaccine in the last 50 years. So why should anyone with a 99% survival rate get this at all? Let the old people that are vulnerable, or the the ones that are scared, get it and they don't have to worry what others do.
You are also aware that more than 3,000 people have died from taking the vaccine? That's more than any other vaccine in the last 50 years. So why should anyone with a 99% survival rate get this at all? Let the old people that are vulnerable, or the the ones that are scared, get it and they don't have to worry what others do.
Posted on 5/6/21 at 9:18 am to PentagonTiger
Which part is false? It is experimental, it was rushed through development.
It takes one woman 9 months to have a baby, 9 women can't have a baby in a month and in vaccine development there is similar constraints. Just because a lot of the scientific community was focused on it doesn't mean there aren't risks to this vaccine that will be uncovered with time. The time that the normal process allows for.
Add to that the risk/reward equation of a fairly harmless to me virus and it is absolutely not worth it.
The one spreading BS is you saying it is definitely safe when we don't know that for sure, but because the government says it is safe you believe it.
It takes one woman 9 months to have a baby, 9 women can't have a baby in a month and in vaccine development there is similar constraints. Just because a lot of the scientific community was focused on it doesn't mean there aren't risks to this vaccine that will be uncovered with time. The time that the normal process allows for.
Add to that the risk/reward equation of a fairly harmless to me virus and it is absolutely not worth it.
The one spreading BS is you saying it is definitely safe when we don't know that for sure, but because the government says it is safe you believe it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News