- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS led by Gorsuch rules for illegal immigrant
Posted on 4/29/21 at 8:24 pm to ClosingTime
Posted on 4/29/21 at 8:24 pm to ClosingTime
100% correct.
Was meaning that had it been one document and after the Cancelation of Removal w/ NTA— the rehearing judge would have determined removal/if removal was proper in relation to the cancelation of removal. In this case that he had the 10 years.
When trying to simplify one of the most complex parts of the law, things get lost in translation.
Was meaning that had it been one document and after the Cancelation of Removal w/ NTA— the rehearing judge would have determined removal/if removal was proper in relation to the cancelation of removal. In this case that he had the 10 years.
When trying to simplify one of the most complex parts of the law, things get lost in translation.
This post was edited on 4/29/21 at 8:26 pm
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News