Senior National Review Writer Takes On James O’Keefe in Twitter Cage Match.....

...and the results are predictable: any pretense of credibility still claimed by NR is left cowering in a fetal position on the mat.



#Twitter ultimately banned O’Keefe.

NR tries and fails to take down James O'Keefe....

To promote his latest expose, O'Keefe tweeted a video clip and wrote, "CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester: 'Look what we did, we [@CNN] got Trump out. I am 100% going to say it, and I 100% believe that if it wasn't for CNN, I don't know that Trump would have got voted out…I came to CNN because I wanted to be a part of that.' "

That is pretty damning and it is pretty good work. Every conservative journalist is proud of O'Keefe's work.

Naturally, National Review is upset.

Enter McLaughlin who tweeted, "If true, damning of CNN. But unfortunately, it's hard for anyone to bet their credibility on believing that a Project Veritas video will withstand close scrutiny."

If true?

O'Keefe has the man on videotape saying the things he quoted him as saying. Who are you going to believe, National Review or your own eyes?

And a magazine best known for opposing the nomination of the most conservative since Reagan has tons of gall to cast aspersions on anyone's credibility.

O'Keefe replied, "Name one thing McLaughlin we’ve published that was untrue. NAME ONE THING, COWARD. Name one deceptive edit in the last decade, and I’ll give you 10K."