- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mike Tyson vs Ken Shamrock in their prime
Posted on 4/14/21 at 7:03 am to cardswinagain
Posted on 4/14/21 at 7:03 am to cardswinagain
Boxing - Tyson
Octagon - Shamrock
I feel like that's the argument for most of the "boxer vs MMA fighter" questions. No way in hell was McGregor ever going to beat Mayweather in the ring, and there's a reason that Mayweather will NEVER step foot in the octagon with McGregor... he'll get his arse kicked. Very different rules, very different training, very different sports.
Tyson would always have chance for a quick knockout because he was swinging fricking sledge hammers for fists, but if someone managed to get in close and get Tyson on the ground, he'd be done for.
Octagon - Shamrock
I feel like that's the argument for most of the "boxer vs MMA fighter" questions. No way in hell was McGregor ever going to beat Mayweather in the ring, and there's a reason that Mayweather will NEVER step foot in the octagon with McGregor... he'll get his arse kicked. Very different rules, very different training, very different sports.
Tyson would always have chance for a quick knockout because he was swinging fricking sledge hammers for fists, but if someone managed to get in close and get Tyson on the ground, he'd be done for.
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 7:04 am
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News