- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New board consideration
Posted on 2/2/21 at 9:16 am
Posted on 2/2/21 at 9:16 am
I'm basing my suggestion off of what went on in the Q thread(s). We might want to consider a "Fringe" board. There were multiple topics discussed in the thread and a separate board for these theories and off the beaten path subjects would be beneficial. For one thing it would keep these discussions off the OT and political boards. Just my 2 cents.
4
Posted on 2/2/21 at 9:31 am to Chrome
A "Fringe Board?"
At what point do we just tell people to find another website instead of making a board for conspiracy theorists and Q tards
At what point do we just tell people to find another website instead of making a board for conspiracy theorists and Q tards
Posted on 2/2/21 at 9:35 am to Ed Osteen
You could tell them to take a hike, but the same people in those threads make contributions on the regular in other forums here.
Posted on 2/2/21 at 9:43 am to Chrome
I get that, but I also wouldn't be surprised if the owner hasn't been wondering what to do with all these crazy Q threads going forward. I doubt they want to bring even more crazies here by highlighting it even considering the additional traffic. just my 2 cents 
Posted on 2/2/21 at 9:49 am to Ed Osteen
True, Chicken would have to consider what liabilities there would be having such a forum. But at least all the conspiracy stuff would be in one place.
As far as bringing more crazies, it might be a plus. Think about all the pharmaceutical advertising he could do.
As far as bringing more crazies, it might be a plus. Think about all the pharmaceutical advertising he could do.
Posted on 2/2/21 at 11:04 am to Chrome
quote:
We might want to consider a "Fringe" board
That's the Political Board.
Posted on 2/2/21 at 12:24 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
That's the Political Board.
That's seems to be the default board, yet some material discussed (like in parts of Q thread) go beyond what would be considered political.
Look at the volume in the original Q thread (6000 pages), close to a third of it was composed of alternate subject matter. This makes me feel that there is a place for these discussions.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 11:48 am to Chrome
so you can stay comfy and cozy in pretend normal land.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 11:52 am to Chrome
quote:
conspiracy stuff
issue with people like you is you categorize real information that isn't on the tv as conspiracy
do you even know what that word means?
somehow people like you determined that anything not reported by the media is a conspiracy and can't discern between actual info that should be added to an investigation and a theory.
example: the same financial data was housed in the exact spot hit at the pentagon and WTC7. days before 911 there was talk of missing and unaccounted trillions of dollars. these two spots that were destroyed were the only places on earth that housed the answer to the missing trillions.
acquiring the information that the spot at the pentagon and WTC7 is where this info was stored isn't a conspiracy itself, it's literally acquiring information in an investigation.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 1:39 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:
issue with people like you is you categorize real information that isn't on the tv as conspiracy
quote:
somehow people like you determined that anything not reported by the media is a conspiracy and can't discern between actual info that should be added to an investigation and a theory.
quote:
people like you
Assume much? While there are those who jump at everything as a conspiracy, I found that many (at least here on TD) do their dilagance to disprove such ideas. Many dig into what evidence they have access to find out what is going on. The one thing I discovered on the political forum is that you better know what you're talking about and better cite credible sources or get screwed with the quickness.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 1:39 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:
Hidden Tiger
what's your favorite conspiracy?
Posted on 2/3/21 at 1:45 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:talk to us like we’re idiots because we don’t “know” all this stuff that you think we should, and you provide no links, no context clues, and no info what so ever to find said info.
issue with people like you is you
Take your example for example.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 2:42 pm to CaptainsWafer
quote:
you provide no links, no context clues, and no info what so ever to find said info.
Hidden Tiger, remember when I wrote about citing credible sources. This is why.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 7:46 pm to CaptainsWafer
quote:
talk to us like we’re idiots because we don’t “know” all this stuff that you think we should, and you provide no links, no context clues, and no info what so ever to find said info.
Take your example for example.
laugh
OT Lounge thread that lists 10-15 points on Bill Gates asking people to guess who these points describes is a completely acceptable thing to do on a board like that without fricking sources in the OP.
get real
This post was edited on 2/3/21 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 2/3/21 at 8:30 pm to Hidden Tiger
quote:
OT Lounge thread that lists 10-15 points on Bill Gates asking people to guess who these points describes is a completely acceptable thing to do on a board like that without fricking sources in the OP.
Applying a strawman argument doesn't work here.
ETA If you read any of the Q thread you would have noticed that posters provided evidence and sources of information.
This post was edited on 2/3/21 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 2/4/21 at 11:19 am to Chrome
quote:
If you read any of the Q thread you would have noticed that posters provided evidence and sources of information.
Out of curiosity was it mostly tweets? Or screen grabs of 4chan or chans in general?
What is considered evidence in the Q thread?
Posted on 2/4/21 at 11:31 am to Ed Osteen
quote:I know you didn't ask me but I want to nominate mogray's "Best Conspiracy Theory" as the thread he started on the Poli Board that claimed Ms. magazine was a CIA-funded psy ops publication intended to sow discord and division between men and women in the USA.
Hidden Tiger
what's your favorite conspiracy?
It was part of a larger CIA operation to encourage feminism in the US to destabilize American society and disrupt the traditional family unit so that children would be turned over to The State earlier in life.
Now THAT is a damn fine conspiracy theory!
ETA: I want to point out he stands by that conspiracy theory even today... Poli Board post today
This post was edited on 2/4/21 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:32 pm to Chrome
Fantasy politics board would be a better name. That way the morons who don't demand proof can have an echo chamber and Chicklin can still get his desired clicks from those scumbags.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:34 pm to RIPMachoMan
quote:
Out of curiosity was it mostly tweets? Or screen grabs of 4chan or chans in general?
Generally speaking Q would drop info and links. The links were info on individuals and corporations. The info showed the political and financial connections. It was up to readers on 4chan and others (like us in the Q thread) to investigate to see if these things were true.
This post was edited on 2/4/21 at 12:36 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News