Yes it did most certainly happen. First off, Foreign Aid by it’s very nature is a form of quid pro quo and Biden himself has admitted that he leveraged billions in foreign aid for Ukraine to fire it’s top prosecutor.

Yet despite Biden’s claim it was not for personal gain, the very reason Trump was targeted in the first phony impeachment hoax is because Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, had reached out to the Trump administration to inform Trump that Ukrainian prosecutors planned to reopen a wide-ranging investigation into the influence of the Biden clan and Burisma Holdings. In other words, Biden did exactly what the Democrats accused President Trump of doing during their first Impeachment hoax.

These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story....

.... Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative.

And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

For instance, Burisma’s American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country’s chief prosecutor and offered “an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures” about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government’s official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor's firing was announced.

In addition, Burisma’s American team offered to introduce Ukrainian prosecutors to Obama administration officials to make amends, according to that memo and the American legal team’s internal emails.

The memos raise troubling questions:

1.) If the Ukraine prosecutor’s firing involved only his alleged corruption and ineptitude, why did Burisma's American legal team refer to those allegations as “false information?"

2.) If the firing had nothing to do with the Burisma case, as Biden has adamantly claimed, why would Burisma’s American lawyers contact the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case?

This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 5:32 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by GoGo

Santa Monica

Member since Jan 2021

111 posts

Posted on 1/21/21 at 6:41 pm to Toomer Deplorable

did you just link a John Solomon editorial as some sort of evidence?

why? why even bother? you might as well link trumps twitter.

quote:
Yes it did most certainly happen. First off, Foreign Aid by it’s very nature is a form of quid pro quo and Biden himself has admitted that he leveraged billions in foreign aid for Ukraine to fire it’s top prosecutor.

what Biden did was on behalf of the US Government. it was our official state policy, right out in the open for the world to see, not a secret "I would like you to do us a favor though" phone call asking for dirt on a political rival.

we know what Biden said because he laughed about on a stage. we know what trump said because a whistle blower said he buried the transcript on a secret black server.

quote:
Yet despite Biden’s claim it was not for personal gain

it wasnt

quote:
...the very reason Trump was targeted in the first phony impeachment hoax is because Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, had reached out to the Trump administration to inform Trump that Ukrainian prosecutors planned to reopen a wide-ranging investigation into the influence of the Biden clan and Burisma Holdings.

the frick?

NONE of that is true. none of that is even remotely close to anything thats ever been true.