Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

1 Hour after Joe is Sworn in... WHO admits it's Bull shite in statement!

Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:04 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55443 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:04 pm
quote:

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1).

The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load.

Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

literally one hour after Biden takes the oath, the WHO admits that PCR testing at high amplification rates alters the predictive value of the tests and results in a huge number of false positives pic.twitter.com/iDtXmappRw
— Andy Swan (@AndySwan)




LINK
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28177 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:11 pm to
This was known and reported by even the test manufactures last summer. But we kept pushing forward...
Posted by Otto Scorzany
Member since Nov 2020
1027 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:22 pm to
Wow. Anything was acceptable by anyone to get Trump out. You think cheating on vote counts didn’t enter anyone’s head to do?
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24030 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:26 pm to
Here is what sucks. We knew this was going to happen. A lot of people called this months ago. Yet NOTHING will be done. There will be noise made by a small set of the population who pays attention, the press will say science "evolved" or some such other BS buzz phrase and the masses will move on.

Really starting to hate some people.
Posted by BlacknGold
He Hate Me
Member since Mar 2009
12414 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed


this has always been the case

quote:

Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.


when someone tests positive for a weak amount, it's been standard to re-test using the same method to get a more accurate assessment

quote:

literally one hour after Biden takes the oath, the WHO admits that PCR testing at high amplification rates alters the predictive value of the tests and results in a huge number of false positives


how is this taken from the above? of course if you test more, you get more false positives. that's never been denied. hence why WHO says you should re-test those low samples. trying real hard for the "gotchas"
Posted by Soku
Europe
Member since Jan 2021
6 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:38 pm to
LINK World is watching America. Your move.
This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 1:39 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55443 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:55 pm to
quote:



this has always been the case

quote:
Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.





And obviously you did not read the whole article.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24030 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 2:18 pm to
I am not sure what or where that video comes from, but I do know my son is a crewman on the types of helicopters shown - they are very specific to his unit and battalion and are not just "regular" army Blackhawks and he is not preparing for anything. They are slower than they have ever been.

Last action he saw was a field trip to Africa for about a week around Halloween.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram