re: Trump's court cases: have they had chance to present their evidence in a complete fashion?

Evidence necessary to meet the standard to defeat an initial motion to dismiss is intentionally set rather "light". 9 times out of 10 affadavit(s) are plenty good enough to meet the plaintiff's burden at that preliminary stage. Typically the plaintiff meets the light burden which in turn leads to the all-important discovery stage. It's a rare thing for a plaintiff to have the bulk of his evidence bagged and ready to go prior to discovery processes. In fact, more often than not the plaintiff secures his best evidence during that subsequent discovery stage.

Long story short, the judges held the plaintiffs in these matters to a cartoonish stringent standard for an initial motion to dismiss, the intentions being to derail the cases before plaintiffs could have secured much, much better evidence, as it typically goes. It was all an embarrassing and disgusting show of jurisprudential service.