re: LSU vs USC

quote:

---

You are the pot calling the kettle black. You recently had a post stating that you "know" that LSU fans will get antsy or something of the sort if they fall out of the SEC race early

---

I sure did.

quote:

---

Perhaps you need to go back adn preface that so it does not get questioned

---

No

quote:

---

Know is a "strong" word as you implied. You prefaced it with nothing. One could easily say "how do you know that for sure?"

---

It'll be okay

quote:

---

But that woudl look quite follish, b/c, even though you predicted the future, which you warned me against, you will likely be correct.

---

You have reading comprehension problems. I didn't say that.

I told you to be careful of what you say in the future about what you claim to know. I was talking about the things you recall and such, not to be careful about predicting the future, wingnut.

quote:

---

It's not a pride issue with me. Just as in other threads when you incorrectly assumed I implied and even typed "death" threats, your assumptions are incorrect.

---

That's only time I've been incorrect in any conversation with you. Unlike you, I had the courage to swallow my pride and acknowledge you didn't say that.

The problem here is you think you're fooling someone. You thought you could fool someone in the last thread that you didn't care about what LSU fans cared or obsessed with regarding USC. And it didn't turn out well for you.

quote:

---

y the way, nice attempt at a personal attack on "reading comprehension". Almost as bad as name calling, which you have also done. That is almost a new low. I was well aware of what you meant and stated many many many times that I did not have to be around here to be correct

---

You beated around the bush on that. Why did you keep telling me to check the "data" if you knew what I was arguing? You didn't. That's why. It took you a while to realize that. Why? Because you don't have strong reading comprehension skills.

quote:

---

see I bolded that one for you. I only tagged the "I am confident I am sure" because you seem to question how I could "know" that.

---

I was just trying to get you to come clean on whether or not you were around to witness what you claimed. You couldn't swallow your pride and come on out and directly say it. You didn't the courage to do that. That's why this carried on.

quote:

---

that. My point was and always has been, I do not need to know to be sure in this case. And you challenged that as well.

---

The only thing I challenged was whether or not you witnessed what was being said back then. The only reason I did was because of how confidently you said such. You didn't realize that early on. You thought I was arguing that what you claimed was being said wasn't being. Let me guess, you'll respond with something about how "I didn't say that" like a 3rd grader?