quote:
In other words, you're not really positive how LSU fans talked about USC on this website, but you bet they didn't talk about USC as a rivalry then, eventhough you spouted off as if you knew first-hand earlier in the thread when you really didn't know first-hand.

Never said first hand. That's you trying to imply things again.

To answer you question or reply to the statement:
No, I am REALLY positive. Just as postive that the moon was in the sky before I was even born. That is how positive I am that LSU fans did not talk as much about USC on this website or others prior to 2003. That is how positive I am that the local papers and sports radio did not discuss as much prior to then. If you want to verify, as you seem interested in doing so, you could always try to get info from webmasters of this site, other sites and do newspaper archives etc.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Rocket

Member since Mar 2004

61117 posts

Posted on 8/24/08 at 10:43 am to LSUTANGERINE

quote:
Never said first hand. That's you trying to imply things again

YOu don't have to say "first hand".

Of course I'm implying things because that's what you implied, you talked as if you know/knew first hand but you really don't.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Wideman

Arlington, Virginia

Member since Jul 2005

11721 posts

Posted on 8/24/08 at 10:58 am to LSUTANGERINE

You're right. We never discussed anything related to USC prior to 2003.

The split national championship and ESPN's consistent love fest with the Trojans (as well as the whole, "can they three-peat" stuff) caused many LSU fans to despise USC a bit.

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board