- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GA Governor endorses adding photo ID requirements
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:09 am to RealDawg
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:09 am to RealDawg
What SOS had said was something to the effect of; "well he hasn't talked to me".
Just because he hadn't talked to SOS,doesn't mean there wasn't a settlement made. There are more than the S(S, whom should be facing a recall - long with Kemp and Lt. Gov., with whom a "settlement" could be legally made. How about the Republican Senate for the state of GA, for starters.
THEY were the ones round-ended on this whole thing.
Just because he hadn't talked to SOS,doesn't mean there wasn't a settlement made. There are more than the S(S, whom should be facing a recall - long with Kemp and Lt. Gov., with whom a "settlement" could be legally made. How about the Republican Senate for the state of GA, for starters.
THEY were the ones round-ended on this whole thing.
1
Posted on 1/12/21 at 7:11 am to chocolatepony241
quote:
Just because he hadn't talked to SOS,doesn't mean there wasn't a settlement made.
Yes, that is exactly what it means.
Settlement of a case requires settlement with all parties. Even if the plaintiffs settled with some parties and just dismissed the case as to Raffensperger, they are required to inform the SoS of what is going on.
And most settlement agreements are submitted to the Court so that breach of the agreement constitutes contempt of a Court Order.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News