- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “Full Metal Jacket” - I’ve flipped, I like 2nd half better
Posted on 1/11/21 at 1:03 pm to theantiquetiger
Posted on 1/11/21 at 1:03 pm to theantiquetiger
I think Kubrick is the greatest director of all time, but FMJ as a whole falls flat. The first half is driven by Ermey's incredible performance and some typically Kubrickian camera work, but it sets up... well, nothing. The second half feels like almost a completely different movie. The film has two messages which are completely contradictory: that boot camp is too harsh and either turns young men into mindless killing machines or drives them crazy if they can't handle it, and then that the reality of war is too overwhelming for those exposed to it to be expected to bear. So which is it? You can't both criticize the system for overpreparing young men for war and also criticize them for sending them into something they aren't prepared for. If the message is supposed to be that there is no way to prepare someone for the reality of war, that would be understandable, but that's not how the movie presents itself.
As much as I love Kubrick, at heart FMJ suffers from not being Apocalypse Now, which is a better movie in every way.
As much as I love Kubrick, at heart FMJ suffers from not being Apocalypse Now, which is a better movie in every way.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News