Started By
Message

re: Night vision vs Thermal

Posted on 12/28/20 at 1:38 pm to
Posted by jdavid1
Member since Jan 2014
2469 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 1:38 pm to
Most people say thermal monocular to scan & locate, and a good NV to identify & shoot. I don't have that kind of budget so a thermal weapon sight is what I did.

quote:

Thermal is the clear winner if you have $4k+ to spend


Thermal prices have come down significantly in the last few years. The Flir 223 was a great sight for right at 2K, but they have been discontinued. The new Bering Optics Hogster scopes are incredible and range from 2,300-3,300.
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18396 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

The Flir 223 was a great sight for right at 2K


I won one at my local gun shop 2 years ago in a raffle contest. I have it on my 300 BO SBR it’s a hog killing machine. I use underwood maximum expansion subs. They do the killing if you do your part.

I have had a PVS14 and thermal is the clear winner for hunting. If you want to drive around at night with no lights then PVS14 is a winner.

This post was edited on 12/28/20 at 1:47 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram