- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: General Reading Question
Posted on 11/30/20 at 8:00 am to auyushu
Posted on 11/30/20 at 8:00 am to auyushu
My main one was the "understand or interpret the nature or significance of" that I felt could be applied to a person listening to an audiobook if they so choose.
You also have computers which read in audio inputs and since we are all just advanced AI running in a simulation - seems like we can read audio.
(My main goal was to get to utterly technical it sort of ruined that discussion and ended the audiobook reading argument).
You also have computers which read in audio inputs and since we are all just advanced AI running in a simulation - seems like we can read audio.
(My main goal was to get to utterly technical it sort of ruined that discussion and ended the audiobook reading argument).
This post was edited on 11/30/20 at 8:01 am
1
Posted on 11/30/20 at 9:38 am to Sneaky__Sally
quote:
I felt could be applied to a person listening to an audiobook if they so choose.
That’s the thing. Listening is not reading.
I’m not saying one is better then the other, just they aren’t the same.
Again, I’ll use the podcast example. I had an episode of knifepoint horror on during my drive to work. By your definition I was “reading”. I argue that could not be more wrong.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News