Started By
Message

re: PA Early Voting Numbers: 1.85M Total, 69% D, 21% R, 9% Other

Posted on 10/27/20 at 8:56 pm to
Posted by purpleandgoldhaze
San Antonio
Member since Oct 2015
134 posts
Posted on 10/27/20 at 8:56 pm to
Do you think this kind of early mail-in vote lead is the firewall that the dems hoped for? Based on my math and assuming a favorable break for dems from independents, this comes out to roughly a 1.4 million vote lead at present. PA had right at 6 million voters in the 2016 election. If the in-person voting breaks similarly for Pubs, that firewall will not be enough.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
46619 posts
Posted on 10/27/20 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

Do you think this kind of early mail-in vote lead is the firewall that the dems hoped for? Based on my math and assuming a favorable break for dems from independents, this comes out to roughly a 1.4 million vote lead at present. PA had right at 6 million voters in the 2016 election. If the in-person voting breaks similarly for Pubs, that firewall will not be enough.


I think the numbers in FL and NC are good for Trump, actually. I’m concerned about PA and Philly because of the sheer numbers coming out of there and the spread thus far is a wide one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram