Started By
Message

re: Rafa legacy

Posted on 10/12/20 at 10:36 am to
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
3985 posts
Posted on 10/12/20 at 10:36 am to

I still put the crown on Fed but I'm not going to argue with anyone who picks one of the other two.

For me, Fed was just slightly the more complete player. He didn't have any weaknesses. He could adjust his mental focus and style of play to excel under any circumstances, regardless of the surface, his opponent or his age/physical condition. The fact that he has a chance to win 400 Grand Slam matches (when 150 is probably the standard for greatness) is a testament to that.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50382 posts
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:36 am to
quote:

He didn't have any weaknesses. He could adjust his mental focus and style of play to excel under any circumstances, regardless of the surface, his opponent or his age/physical condition.


Record in Grand Slams

Since 2010 (Fed 29)
vs. Djok
2-10

Since 2008 (Fed 27)
vs. Nadal
2-7


Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:50 am to
quote:

He didn't have any weaknesses



He didn't?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram