Is it me or did Sullivan make clear at the beginning that Gleeson SHALL be a part of the record and a special counsel. When essentially Gleeson is the Judges lawyer so he calls him special counsel as in special lawyer not like a special council like what Mueller was, right?

Also Sullivan said he doesn't want to hear certain things yet he went after Sydney for writing a letter to Barr?

So essentially the Judge's first statement (and reading his lawyers diatribe) who has no business in this, showed his bias that he has already made up his mind before hearing the case?

This post was edited on 9/29/20 at 2:52 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Uncle Stu

#AlbinoLivesMatter

Member since Aug 2004

33660 posts

Posted on 9/29/20 at 2:57 pm to cajunangelle

quote:
Is it me or did Sullivan make clear at the beginning that Gleeson SHALL be a part of the record and a special counsel. When essentially Gleeson is the Judges lawyer so he calls him special counsel as in special lawyer not like a special council like what Mueller was, right?

No, I took it as the Mueller SCO, when he used the term special council

I forgot who/when, but in earlier arguments the SCO was brought up, any subsequent mention of the SCO, I take, to be referencing that specifically

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Uncle Stu

#AlbinoLivesMatter

Member since Aug 2004

33660 posts

Posted on 9/29/20 at 2:59 pm to cajunangelle

quote:
So essentially the Judge's first statement (and reading his lawyers diatribe) who has no business in this, showed his bias that he has already made up his mind before hearing the case?

yes - exactly

Almost at every turn, anytime Sullivan speaks he is overtly, on the record, desperately trying to defend his supposed impartiality. He keeps trying to tie his previous decisions in the Flynn case to show non-bias

He's clearly in self-protection mode, and Gleeson is making it worse

2 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board