- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ranking the BCS Controversies
Posted on 8/2/08 at 6:27 pm to INFIDEL
Posted on 8/2/08 at 6:27 pm to INFIDEL
quote:
Most of these problems have arisen due to the belief that the AP and the Coaches polls were accurate. If that is the case, then why the hell did we create the BCS to begin with?! I was under the assumption that the BCS was created to remove the human bias from the polls. If we wanted it to simply reflect the human polls, then creating it would have been a huge waste of time, correct?
Incorrect. The problems occur with the idea that it is possible in most years to identify the 2 most worthy teams after a 12 game schedule. This is impossible and the correct answer is that no formula or solution is possible under the given circumstances in most years.
Just to add to the 2000 controversey was that Washington was also a 1 loss team that year that beat Miami. So Washington beats Miami and Miami beats Florida St., so naturally Florida St. gets the nod.
This post was edited on 8/2/08 at 6:32 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News