Started By
Message

re: I’m watching The Last Minutes of Flight 93 on the History Channel

Posted on 9/12/20 at 6:27 am to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
44072 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 6:27 am to
quote:

I just don't remember any of that and I thought I followed it pretty closely. But, oh well. I concede. I know that protocol says we can do that for the greater good (as in saving a larger target than the passengers on board) but I just don't remember that.


Same here - This is the first I have heard of the "2nd debris site" - I don't understand how it could have escaped public revelation on some news network during the immediate aftermath of the attack. I cannot believe I just 'missed it' - or else my mental capacity is deteriorating at a rapid rate now.

Surely it is not a "recent" discovery -
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
31688 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 6:42 am to
From what I've read any description as a "second debris site" seems a bit overstated. The explanation I've seen that's anywhere close to that is the discovery of some debris that would have been light enough to have "ricocheted" back up off the ground in such a powerful collision with the earth. This type debris was light enough to have caught the 10ish mph wind that was said to have been on that day. Papers and the like. The prevailing winds took that type debris only a couple or few miles downwind to Indian Lake. From that the story grew.

Also, there was a fan from one of the engines that deflected off the ground and skidded or flew or whatever approx 300 or so yards from the main crash site.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram