Started By
Message

re: Bucks and Magic are boycotting tonight's game UPDATE All games postponed

Posted on 8/29/20 at 2:52 pm to
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 2:52 pm to
Stand your ground is more than just not having a duty to retreat, it is typically a very vague definition of justifiable lethal force that basically includes feeling threatened and creates an enormous issue in terms of establishing clear legal lines and precedents. In such a state, yeah, Kyle could probably leverage such a shitty, counter-productive law to claim self defense. In Wisconsin? Not likely going to be so easy.

In Wisconsin the threshold is higher. You must be able to demonstrate your life was in imminent mortal danger or bodily harm.Complicated further if Kyle was the initial antagonist. It would be a stretch of an order of magnitude to think you are in imminent mortal danger if, speaking to the first murder, an unarmed person is simply running at you or lunging at you with only a fist.


You might be able to get some warped jury or some exceptional lawyer to make some absurd case that his client is such a pussy that he felt, despite having a gun, that this skinny kid lunging at him unarmed was gonna punch him to death and he had no other capable avenue before resorting to lethal force, but it’s stretching it by quite a lot.

And AGAIN, you and I DO NOT know the context in which led to that chase. Wisconsin law also states clearly:

(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person's assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.

Again, lunging, chasing, hearing a gunshot you cant orientate, not even trying to physically restrain the pursuer before resorting to lethal force, that is a stretch of enormous proportions to claim justifiable lethal force in the name of self defense.

He is going to have a tough go claiming self defense on the first murder, probably, likely going to be able to get out of the second one, but I am not the jury.....Still none of that changes the points made yesterday, or the larger issue of the disproportionate way the police uphold the law based on color of skin and prejudice in the community, and the handling of Kyle brings to bear I clear and concisely that systemic failure that are continuing to gloss over to prop up your boy the militia racist.
This post was edited on 8/29/20 at 3:03 pm
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
15316 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 3:07 pm to
LINK

You should watch this breakdown by an attorney
This post was edited on 8/29/20 at 3:08 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111707 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

You might be able to get some warped jury or some exceptional lawyer to make some absurd case that his client is such a pussy that he felt, despite having a gun, that this skinny kid lunging at him unarmed was gonna punch him to death and he had no other capable avenue before resorting to lethal force, but it’s stretching it by quite a lot.
With this, you may as well just come out and say you don't even want to try to discuss this rationally. It's not irrational in the least to think this was self defense.

quote:

harm.Complicated further if Kyle was the initial antagonist.
Whoa, you know this how? Funny how earlier you sarcastically stated one of my points was a conservative talking points and how you're passing shite off as fact that you absolutely do not know if it is fact. For every report that he was the aggressor, there are reports that he was not, you're choosing to believe one side because you're not even remotely trying to view this through an unbiased lens.

quote:

A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack
What has been proven with regards to Kyle provoking others to attack him?

I saw a video of rioters trying to push a burning garbage into a gas station and Kyle extinguishing that fire, and making the mob angry with him. Is that what you're saying is provoking? If not, then what was?

quote:

Still none of that changes the points made yesterday, or the larger issue of the disproportionate way the police uphold the law based on color of skin and prejudice in the community, and the handling of Kyle brings to bear I clear and concisely that systemic failure that are continuing to gloss over to prop up your boy the militia racist
Like I said, you're showing here that you already know the charges are BS, so you're making preemptive excuses as to why he'll get off when the reality is, he'll probably get off because this wasn't 1st degree murder.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram