- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another day...another Obama appointed judge reversing a Trump policy
Posted on 8/13/20 at 6:59 pm to kingbob
Posted on 8/13/20 at 6:59 pm to kingbob
quote:
Changing the definition of a "taking" would be a massive watershed moment in administrative law.
Who gives a frick? Administrative law is all bullshite anyway... some liberal nerd bureaucrat sitting in a basement at the EPA just making shite up that NO ONE voted on or gets any say in.
1
Posted on 8/13/20 at 9:05 pm to BayBengal9
Because changes in administrative law are based on whether or not the administration’s interpretation of the law is reasonable. If the interpretation being offered by a new administrator is remarkably different, then they will have to either prove:
A. That their interpretation is reasonable because that’s what the drafters meant it to mean; or
B. That research and data supports changing the interpretation to what the new administration desires, i.e. that it’s reasonable policy.
Thus, big changes are typically frowned upon by judges.
A. That their interpretation is reasonable because that’s what the drafters meant it to mean; or
B. That research and data supports changing the interpretation to what the new administration desires, i.e. that it’s reasonable policy.
Thus, big changes are typically frowned upon by judges.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News