re: The Top 10 Greatest Generals of All-Time - According to Mathematics

quote:

---

Where could I find that information?

---

The late Edward H. Bonekemper III published a study entitled Grant and Lee: Victorious American and Vanquished Virginian back in 2012 with these statistics. I can quote you the figures from his book. On page 395 he cites James McPherson, the leading historian on the subject of this generation, by quoting the following: "For the war as a whole, Lee's army had a higher casualty rate than the armies commanded by Grant. The romantic glorification of the Army of Northern Virginia by generations of Lost Cause writers has obscured this truth."

From 1862-1865, Bonekemper writes, Lee's army suffered 209,000 combined casualties while Grant's suffered a combined 153,642 casualties. While Lee inflicted 55,000 casualties on Grant's army (43% of his total force) in the Overland Campaign of 1864, he did so while on the defensive and lost over 30,000 (47% of his force) of his own soldiers in the process. So while Lee inflicted more casualties on Grant, Grant took out a more sizable chunk of Lee's army in the process.