re: The Top 10 Greatest Generals of All-Time - According to Mathematics

quote:

---

The quality of the opposition was much better in the East.

---

This is true. And the quality of the Army of the Potomac was lacking to a certain degree. While Lee was most definitely outnumbered by the Union army, many of the troops in the latter command were brand new, having never seen combat. Of the corps commanders that Meade had at his disposal, Hancock of the II Corps was not the same Hancock before his wounding at Gettysburg. This would become more and more obvious as the campaign dragged on. Warren of the V Corps was operating beyond his ability and should never have been given command of a corps to begin with. Sedgwick of the VI Corps was very popular among the troops but he lacked a killer instinct and would never take the initiative. He needed explicit orders to do something before he did it. And then Burnside of the IX Corps, though not originally attached to the Army of the Potomac due to his seniority of rank over Meade, was not a good commander of anything. And while Meade had made the right decision to consolidate his army into fewer corps, he definitely overcompensated as the corps he had in his army were now too big and unwieldy.

On the other side of the equation, Lee's leadership from the top down was battle hardened and had demonstrated an ability to command at a high level, though A.P. Hill was definitely struggling due to underlying health problems. Plus all 65,000 of Robert E. Lee's soldiers were battle hardened veterans and on the defensive. They had clear advantages over their Union counterparts (experience and defensive terrain being the most prevalent).