- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Atlanta, Charlotte or Nashville
Posted on 8/6/20 at 9:41 am to The Spleen
Posted on 8/6/20 at 9:41 am to The Spleen
Marietta proper is fine and has some charm. It's not 30 miles away though. Overall I think Atlanta suburbs are declining, but that wasn't really my point in the 30 mile thing. But on a county-by-county basis, it's hard to see which suburban counties are on the rise.
IMO it's a cycle with the outer burbs especially. They go from somewhat rural/nothing to suburban in character, but they're fairly cheap because of the distance. It leads to a boom in development and increasing quality of life (at least from a suburban angle). People with reasonable priorities flood those areas looking for decent schools and space, but because of the nature of the development (cheaper, chain-centric, etc.) it's often followed by a steep decline because it's accessible. Moreover, because they've got nothing to hold value (far from the city, usually no geographic features, new-built cheap neighborhoods instead of older, established areas), people flee to the next outer suburb that's growing up. Which leads to a vacuum and home price collapse that is filled with people who may not have the original priorities of the first group.
IMO it's a cycle with the outer burbs especially. They go from somewhat rural/nothing to suburban in character, but they're fairly cheap because of the distance. It leads to a boom in development and increasing quality of life (at least from a suburban angle). People with reasonable priorities flood those areas looking for decent schools and space, but because of the nature of the development (cheaper, chain-centric, etc.) it's often followed by a steep decline because it's accessible. Moreover, because they've got nothing to hold value (far from the city, usually no geographic features, new-built cheap neighborhoods instead of older, established areas), people flee to the next outer suburb that's growing up. Which leads to a vacuum and home price collapse that is filled with people who may not have the original priorities of the first group.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 9:56 am to Pettifogger
Okay let’s bring this back to point:
Let’s rank by the following:
Career advancement/opportunities
Family life (mid 40s)
Amenities (restaurants, shows, parks, etc)
Housing costs ($800k-$1m)
Ease of access for travel (push between Charlotte and Atl.)
Long term viability
Let’s rank by the following:
Career advancement/opportunities
Family life (mid 40s)
Amenities (restaurants, shows, parks, etc)
Housing costs ($800k-$1m)
Ease of access for travel (push between Charlotte and Atl.)
Long term viability
Posted on 8/6/20 at 6:44 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Marietta proper is fine
brah.....
quote:
vacuum and home price collapse that is filled with people who may not have the original priorities of the first group.
East Cobb is 50 years old now. Vacuum? Priorities intensified.
Milton wonderously appeared.
Cumming, against all odds, wonderously appeared.
Alpharetta looked to be the new flee haven you refer to, but simply consolidated, and enough so, that the land and power grab that is Johns Creek came to be.
Atlanta´s boring as frick, but don´t make it out to be like other cities in the South. It´s much more dynamic.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News