Started By
Message

re: Was slavery an important factor in the Civil War?

Posted on 7/10/20 at 7:58 am to
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
6810 posts
Posted on 7/10/20 at 7:58 am to
And in typical Yankee fantasy fashion ...revisionist history once again rears it's ugly head. There is better question, you would fail to be able to answer.

What exactly what the north fighting for?

It certainly has nothing to do with freeing slaves. It has nothing to do with secession ....That statement makes Lincoln out to be the ultimate liar. A modern day version of the combination of Schumer and Pelosi.

12 Years earlier, Lincoln stood up before Congress and embraced the ideals of secession. In john Kerry fashion, he was for the bill before he was against the bill.

MONEY, pure and simple. The North embraced slavery, as long as, they did not have to admit their citizens had slaves of their own. 60-80% of all income came by way of the tariffs collected at southern ports. Lincoln's Treasury Department was on the way to becoming nothing more than an empty closet.

So I ask again ..If the freedom of slaves was not the reason for the north starting a war ...Exactly what was the issue for the north to cross the Potomac?

Not only was racism on full display up north in the 1800's ....it continues to be on full display today. There are no Saints in the north ....

Regarding statues ...I've never seen one and have never owned a Confederate Battle Flag. Statues don't bother anyone ....If they did, why are there three Lenin Statues no one is demanding to have removed from US shores?

Why would Military Generals start a demand to have Confederate Battle Flags censored from Military Bases ...yet turn a blind eye to BLM stickers on the base? It's reverse discrimination. A Military base is no place to display any political statement of any kind ....That environment has one purpose and one purpose only ...the defense of the Nation ..

Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 7/10/20 at 8:29 am to
quote:

And in typical Yankee fantasy fashion ...revisionist history once again rears it's ugly head. There is better question, you would fail to be able to answer.

What exactly what the north fighting for?


I'm no Yankee pal, I'm from Southern Louisiana where we consider everyone north of the sothern boundaries of Shreveport a Yankee but the facts are the facts.

Many Southern Democrats decided on succession the moment Lincoln won the 1860 election and some had done so before he was even inaugurated.

And the simple, irrefutable fact is that the Confederacy attacked the United States of America. Lincoln did not start the war neither did he cause the Confederacy.

The Southern Democrats who did both are to blame, pure and fricking simple.

ETA:I never realized that Lincoln was inaugurated in March, the Confederacy was formed and had a fully installed government in FEBURARY and they attacked Fort Sumter in APRIL.

So they formed the Confederacy BEFORE Lincoln was President and attacked US Troops less than a month into his Presidency and some of you yokels want to blame Lincoln for the Civil War...?
This post was edited on 7/10/20 at 8:45 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram