Started By
Message

re: Jim Jordan Demands Answers From Twitter On Moderation/Discrimination

Posted on 7/8/20 at 8:27 pm to
Posted by Not_Sure
Member since Jul 2020
95 posts
Posted on 7/8/20 at 8:27 pm to
This looks like a PR campaign for Parler disguised as a strongly worded letter to twitter on behalf of the US Representatives.

You know, if a person looks at it objectively. Is Parler Twitter’s only competitor? I would think not.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80399 posts
Posted on 7/8/20 at 9:03 pm to
I get the letter for Twitter. The one for Parler is a bit over the top, especially in light of their CEOs comments about what you would say on the street or on national television.

Not intended to be, but could be embarrassing for the Parler guy if he’s questioned about it

But no problem with the Committee gathering info on Twitter.

There will be changes to Section 230 of the CDA within 2 years. Social media has outgrown what 230 was intended to encompass.
Posted by Steadmans Cheddar
Member since Dec 2019
1347 posts
Posted on 7/8/20 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

This looks like a PR campaign for Parler disguised as a strongly worded letter to twitter on behalf of the US Representatives.


That second letter, and any press about the related hearing, are essentially paid advertising for Parler. I wonder what the campaign contribution was.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram